Niger Delta Voters Poised to Reject Tinubu in 2027 Over Rivers State Emergency – Lauretta Onochie’s Stark Warning
In a recent public statement that has reverberated across the Niger Delta and political circles in Abuja, Lauretta Onochie—former Media Aide to ex-President Muhammadu Buhari—warned that Rivers State residents and the broader Niger Delta electorate will “punish” President Bola Tinubu in 2027 for what she called egregious breaches of constitutional order and “lawlessness” during his administration.
Key Context: What Sparked Onochie’s Warning
On March 18, 2025, President Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, the Deputy Governor, and the entire Rivers State House of Assembly.
During the emergency period, Tinubu appointed Vice-Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.) as Sole Administrator to manage state affairs.
The emergency rule lasted for six months, a move that drew criticism from various opposition figures who claimed the measure was both illegal and unconstitutional.
Onochie’s Argument: What She’s Saying Will Happen in 2027
In her statement, Onochie accused Tinubu of inflicting “six months of hell” on Rivers State under what she labelled as an unlawful emergency rule. She asserted that this period would not be forgotten by the people of the Niger Delta. “That lawlessness will be punished in 2027 by Niger Deltans. We are set.”
She suggests that voters in the region will hold the president accountable at the ballot for what she characterizes as a misuse of executive power—abusing emergency powers without constitutional backing and undermining democratic norms in the state.
Legal and Political Fallout
Several PDP governors challenged the legality of Tinubu’s suspension of Governor Fubara and sought to have it overturned by the Supreme Court, arguing the president lacks constitutional power to suspend a state governor or dissolve the legislative assembly except under very specific conditions.
The move raised serious questions among legal analysts, civil society, and political opponents who described it as an overreach—potentially setting dangerous precedents for federal-state relations in Nigeria.
Recent Related Developments
On September 17, 2025, President Tinubu lifted the six-month emergency rule in Rivers State. This reinstated Governor Fubara, the Deputy Governor, and the entire State House of Assembly, marking an official end to the extraordinary federal intervention.
Tinubu cited improved cooperation between state stakeholders and intelligence reports indicating reduced political tension as reasons for lifting the emergency.
Implications for 2027 Elections & Niger Delta Sentiment
1. Popular Backlash: Onochie’s message reflects a widespread sentiment among a section of Rivers State’s population—and more broadly among Niger Deltans—that the emergency rule was a violation of democratic principles. This could translate into electoral backlash in the 2027 polls if opposition parties capitalize on anger over perceptions of federal overreach.
2. Constitutional Debate Fuel: The episode has intensified debate over constitutional limits of executive power in states, especially in emergency declarations. How Tinubu’s party defends its actions legally and politically may influence voter trust.
3. Regional Political Identity: The Niger Delta has always held weight in Nigerian politics, both for its oil wealth and its strategic importance. Statements like Onochie’s may contribute to a more unified regional identity resisting perceived abuses by the centre.
4. Election Strategy Shifts: Opposition forces may build campaigns around themes of federal abuse, constitutionalism, and local autonomy. The Tinubu administration may need to work harder in public relations and governance transparency to counter narratives of lawlessness.
Why This Should Matter
This is not just about Rivers State or a single emergency proclamation. It sits at the intersection of legal legitimacy, public trust, and democratic health in Nigeria. Tinubu’s lifting of the emergency rule does not erase claims of constitutional violations raised during its imposition. Voters, analysts, and political actors will likely hold this moment against the administration—especially given the promise of “punishment” in 2027.
Lauretta Onochie’s pronouncement is more than rhetoric—it is a marker of regional discontent and a warning that democratic violations, perceived or real, carry political costs. As 2027 approaches, the strength of opposition mobilization and the federal government’s response to these grievances will help determine whether “punishment” materializes through votes. Regardless, the Rivers State emergency episode has already become a significant chapter in Nigeria’s evolving story of constitutional power, regional autonomy, and electoral accountability.
0 Comments