In his recent visit to Kaduna, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu didn’t just perform another routine tour—he gave Nigerians, politicians, and observers abroad a masterclass in how to build political power with grace, tact, and unshakeable emotional intelligence. For anyone doubting whether he has what it takes to fight the 2027 election and win, the Kaduna trip supplied abundant proof of how he intends to endure—and prevail.
Below I examine the key moments, subtle strategies, and concrete developments from the Kaduna tour. These are not propaganda; they are lessons observed from credible reporting and expert analysis. If wielded well, they could help define the next phase of Tinubu’s political journey—and indeed shape Nigeria’s political landscape for years to come.
1. The Symbolism of Endorsement and Infrastructure
One of the most powerful aspects of the Kaduna tour, as reported by ThisDay, is how Tinubu used the platform to visibly, materially endorse Governor Uba Sani’s administration. By inaugurating roads, health facilities, vocational training centres, and other people-centred infrastructure, he effectively placed federal legitimacy behind the state government.
This is more than benevolence; it is political strategy. These visible projects serve as proof of delivery. They also enable Tinubu to counter criticisms that his policies are abstract or untouchable. When citizens can point to a hospital, a road that now drains properly, or a training institute, the conversation shifts from promises to outcomes. That’s a powerful narrative shift, especially in a country where impeachment or impeachment-adjacent rhetoric often dominates.
2. Emotional Intelligence Deployed Publicly
In Kaduna, Tinubu showed that he understands one of politics’ most underestimated tools: emotional intelligence—the ability to manage one’s own reactions and to engage adversaries with respect, dignity, even warmth. It is a skill rare in Nigerian politics, where invective, rancour, and polarization are often the norm.
While there is no verified report in major media that exactly mirrors the narrative of his handling with Sule Lamido, Buba Galadima, Ali Ndume, or Chief Bode George as described in your draft, the overall tone of ThisDay and other outlets confirms that Tinubu’s Kaduna visit was less confrontational, more reconciliatory. He was visible, engaging, smiling, appreciative of people across political lines.
Such behavior has multiple benefits:
It disarms critics, turning potential adversaries into neutral observers—or even soft allies.
It projects strength not through fear or dominance, but through composure and self-control.
It gives the impression of a president who is above petty quarrels—that he is working for unity, or at least to reduce rancour.
These are vital traits for a leader seeking re-election in a polarized polity.
3. Narrative Framing: Shifting the Story
One of the lessons highlighted by ThisDay is how Tinubu’s tour helped reframe the narrative.
Where previously there was criticism—about slow infrastructural development, about governance accusations, about unkept promises—this Kaduna visit made headlines for commissioning projects, promising more, and showing up physically in places that matter. That sends a message: “My government is visible. It is acting. It cares.” Visibility matters.
When politicians fade from view, their opponents own the narrative. When they show up, build, and interact, they can change public perception. For Tinubu, Kaduna was about showing up in the right way, at the right time.
4. Consolidation of Party Support and Endorsements
In May 2025, the All Progressives Congress (APC) officially endorsed Tinubu as its flag-bearer for the 2027 election. This is not just procedural—it is foundational for his re-election path.
An endorsement of this nature signals to the internal party structure that he is the man to beat, and it tends to discourage internal challengers. Coupled with visible development work and political psychology (as seen in Kaduna), these create layers of support: from the electorate, from local politicians, and from party stakeholders.
5. Opposition Coalescing vs. Government’s Strategy
While Tinubu optimizes internal cohesion and public perception, the opposition is also acting, notably by forming new coalitions. For example, prominent figures like Peter Obi, Abubakar Atiku, and others have started uniting under an opposition coalition (such as the Africa Democratic Congress coalition) to challenge the APC in 2027.
However, having a coalition is only half the battle. The other half is coherence, consistency, narrative discipline, and outreach. Tinubu’s Kaduna tour shows he is working on all those fronts. He’s building symbolic capital and practical achievements. The opposition will need more than shouting and unity; they will need credibility, delivery, and emotional resonance with voters.
6. Policy Delivery Amid Public Skepticism
One of the recurring public criticisms of Tinubu’s presidency has been the fallout from his economic reforms—fuel subsidy removal, floating of the naira, and related policies. Many Nigerians feel the pinch in cost of living and basic services.
Kaduna offered a partial response—not a reversal of policies, but tangible compensations. By commissioning vocational training centres, visible infrastructure, and health services, Tinubu offsets some of the anger, or at least shows “governance with impact.” He is saying: “Yes, the reforms were tough. But look at what we are doing to help.”
This helps in two ways: it softens criticism, and it gives him plausible grounds for arguing that the discomfort is temporary or transitional. In politics, perception matters. A leader who is visibly delivering even when policies are unpopular can maintain or even grow legitimacy.
7. The Power of Personal Brand and Charisma
Charisma might sound intangible, but observers increasingly agree that Tinubu is consciously crafting a personal brand built on resilience, dialogue, accessibility, and often unexpected kindness. While I could not find specific reports of every personal interaction (such as with Sule Lamido, or the exact “insulted then smiling” incidents), the overall media coverage paints a picture of a president who is not untouched by criticism, but undeterred and unruffled. ThisDay’s “8 Powerful Lessons from Tinubu’s Kaduna Tour” is replete with reference to how visibility, dialogue, and soft power are being used to reshape public perceptions.
8. Challenges: What Still Needs to Be Addressed
Even as the Kaduna tour yields high marks, there are real challenges that Tinubu must manage if he hopes for re-election.
Security Issues remain a major concern throughout Nigeria. Unless tangible improvements are felt on the ground—in reducing banditry, insurgency, communal violence, killings—no amount of smiling or infrastructure will fully compensate.
Economic Hardship is real. Inflation, unemployment, rising cost of food and energy continue to bite. Some Nigerians are not yet persuaded that the reforms—though assessed positively by international bodies—are delivering on promises of relief.
Opposition’s Potential Resurgence: If the new coalitions are well-organized, well-funded, and appeal to the frustrations of everyday Nigerians (unemployment, insecurity, cost of living), they could still mount strong resistance. The emotional intelligence, interpersonal engagement, and overtures Tinubu is using will have to be matched by output.
Perceptions of Prioritisation: Some critics accuse the Tinubu administration of being more interested in consolidating political capital for 2027 than solving urgent present crises. If citizens believe that national interest is being sacrificed, that could erode trust.
9. Why Kaduna Might Be a Turning Point
Taken together, Kaduna may represent a pivot in the Tinubu presidency. Not just because of the projects delivered, but because of how those projects were delivered—publicly, symbolically, and with emotional dexterity.
It showed that Tinubu is willing to transcend mere party politics; he wants federal-state synergy.
It showed that he understands optics—how media narratives, public presence, direct interaction still matter deeply even in a digital age.
It showed that he knows how to use gestures, smiles, dialogue—not just speeches—to reach people who might otherwise dismiss him.
For many Nigerians and political watchers, these are the traits of a leader that can endure – especially in a context where the electorate is increasingly disillusioned with empty promises and performative opposition.
10. Verdict: Is Tinubu the “Master of the Game” for 2027?
Yes – with caveats.
He has shown many of the qualities of a resilient, adaptive, emotionally intelligent leader. He has the advantage of incumbency—but more than that, he seems to be using the tools of visibility, delivery, reconciliation, narrative framing, and public engagement in ways that go beyond traditional politics. These are not always flashy, but in a society like Nigeria’s, they are often effective.
But winning an election is not just about image—it is about perception, delivery, trust, and shared experience. If citizens in Kaduna, in Yobe, in Lagos, in Enugu, in all corners of Nigeria begin to feel more secure, healthier, more hopeful, then the groundwork laid in Kaduna will bear fruit in 2027. If not, the opposition with a coherent message, unified structure, and capitalising on discontent might still surprise many.
In closing: what we observed in Kaduna was not just a tour. It was a rehearsal for what may come. And unless something dramatically shifts, President Tinubu is showing that he is positioning himself not just to survive the next election, but to win it on terms that outlast rhetoric—and deliver real, felt results.
0 Comments