Former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo has emphatically dismissed longstanding allegations that he ever sought a third term in office, once again refuting claims that he attempted to change or extend his constitutional mandate. Speaking at a Democracy Dialogue organized by the Goodluck Jonathan Foundation in Accra, Ghana, Obasanjo argued that not only did he never pursue a third term, but that if he had wanted to, he was well equipped and would have succeeded. His remarks have stirred fresh debate about political power, leadership transitions, and constitutional integrity in Nigeria.
Obasanjo’s Clear Rebuttal
Addressing the audience, Obasanjo made the following claims:
No evidence exists: He asserted that no Nigerian, living or dead, could credibly claim that he ever approached them or discussed seeking a third term in office.
He knew how to do it: Obasanjo said, “I’m not a fool. If I wanted a third term, I know how to go about it.” Thus, the argument goes, the lack of action is itself significant.
Debt relief as proof of capability: He cited his success in securing debt relief for Nigeria from multiple international creditors as evidence that if he had pursued a third term, he could have pulled it off. According to him, achieving debt relief was a more difficult political and diplomatic feat than any attempt to alter constitutional term limits.
Context & Further Commentary
Historical controversy: The idea that Obasanjo pursued a so-called “third-term agenda” is not new. During his presidency (1999–2007), there were public uproars over proposals in the National Assembly to amend the constitution, which some interpreted as attempts to lengthen presidential tenure. Those proposals were eventually rejected.
Present remarks broaden the conversation: At the Democracy Dialogue in Accra, Obasanjo did more than simply deny the claim. He also cautioned leaders who cling to power, warning that such behavior betrays democratic principles and that believing oneself indispensable is a dangerous illusion. He invoked the concept that no leader is essential forever, noting that whether one leaves office or passes away, others will follow.
Eyes on constitutional reform and governance: Obasanjo’s comments feed into ongoing conversations in Nigeria about constitutional amendments, electoral reform, and the need for credible, accountable governance. His refutation is timely given that many citizens and institutions remain wary of power consolidation and "presidential overreach."
Implications for Nigerian Politics
Obasanjo’s statement may have several effects:
Public perception and trust: For many Nigerians, the notion that their leaders might try to stay in office beyond constitutionally prescribed terms remains a major concern. Obasanjo’s forthright denial helps clarify his position, possibly restoring some trust among skeptics.
Precedent and deterrence: The idea that a former president can assertively deny such ambitions, describe them as false narratives, may serve as a warning to other leaders tempted to pursue power extension or manipulation of constitutional norms.
Democratic stability: In a region where constitutional amendments for term extensions have been attempted (or achieved) in some countries, Obasanjo’s remarks underline the importance of institutional checks, legislative resolve, and citizens’ vigilance.
Media and political actors: Allegations often emerge from political opponents, commentators, or interest groups. Obasanjo’s insistence that these claims are unsubstantiated emphasizes the need for evidence-based reporting and credibly sourced political claims.
Conclusion
In his latest statements, former President Olusegun Obasanjo has forcefully rejected all claims of ever wanting a third term, asserting that if he had sought it, he was capable of achieving it. He anchored his argument in past successes—particularly in securing debt relief—and in the lack of any credible evidence to back the third-term narrative. Beyond defending his own legacy, his remarks serve as a broader admonishment to political leaders: clinging to power is not only undemocratic but also unsustainable. As Nigeria continues to wrestle with issues of governance, constitutional reform, and political accountability, Obasanjo’s remarks contribute meaningfully to the national discourse.
0 Comments