On October 7, 2025, Vladimir Putin marked his 73rd birthday, and in the flurry of orchestrated tributes and diplomatic messages, one stood out for both its tone and implications. North Korea’s Supreme Leader, Kim Jong-un, dispatched a glowing congratulatory letter calling Putin his “closest comrade” and lavishing praise on his “wise leadership” in forging what he termed a “new multipolar world.” The gesture underscores the accelerating closeness between Pyongyang and Moscow — a relationship underwritten by strategic pacts, military cooperation, and shared antagonism toward Western influence.
A Birthday Spent at Work — and on the World Stage
Rather than a grand public spectacle, Putin’s 73rd birthday was characterized by a subdued but symbolically loaded schedule. According to the Kremlin, he spent the day in official business — meeting with his security council, fielding foreign calls, and receiving birthday telegrams from allies. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also hinted that Putin might take the evening “off” for more personal reflection.
Domestic messaging around the birthday was tightly choreographed: children in Russian schools and even in occupied Ukrainian territory were instructed to write birthday postcards and recite poems praising the president. The optics point less to spontaneity than to a synchronized show of loyalty in the midst of wartime Russia.
On the external front, congratulatory messages rolled in from a spectrum of friendly states. Chinese President Xi Jinping sent warm greetings, as did Belarus’s Alexander Lukashenko and various leaders from the CIS bloc. Kim Jong-un was widely reported to be the first foreign leader to congratulate Putin, delivering his message through the North Korean state media apparatus.
“Closest Comrade” — What Kim’s Message Really Signals
Kim’s letter, carried by state media KCNA and other North Korean outlets, was remarkably effusive in tone. He addressed Putin as “my most intimate comrade,” lauded his “patriotic devotion,” and credited him with guiding Russia toward global prominence. More than flattery, Kim framed the relationship as fundamental to a shared geopolitical vision:
> “I do not doubt that the allied relations between the two countries … will be invariably carried forward in the future, thanks to the warm friendly relations and close comradely ties between us.”
He reiterated Pyongyang’s support for Moscow’s "just struggle" to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity — a clear reference to the ongoing war with Ukraine — and pledged to uphold the bilateral treaty that deepened strategic partnership between the two capitals.
Kim’s language echoed earlier statements asserting that Pyongyang and Moscow would always stand together, their “immortal friendship” never altered. In press coverage across both Korean and Russian media, the overt tone and frequent use of militaristic and ideological phrasing hint that this message was meant more as a signal of alignment than mere birthday diplomacy.
The Deepening Russian–DPRK Nexus: Beyond Birthday Flattery
While Kim’s greeting is newsworthy in itself, it also highlights the broader trajectory of Moscow–Pyongyang relations, which have intensified rapidly over the past year. In June 2024, the two nations cemented their ties through the Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, a pact that envisaged defense coordination and mutual strategic assistance. Since then, North Korea has reportedly supplied tens of millions of artillery shells, missiles, and other military hardware to Russia — a transaction that has raised alarms in Seoul, Tokyo, and Washington.
Last month, Putin and Kim met one-on-one in Beijing during a multilateral parade commemorating the end of World War II. The meeting included high-level delegations and focused on reinforcing their “fraternal duty” toward one another. Analysts suggest that the gathering was intended to project an axis of authoritarian resistance to Western-led order.
The optics have also grown more striking. During the September 3 parade in Beijing, a rare live “hot mic” moment caught Putin and Xi Jinping conversing about biotechnology, organ transplants, and even the possibility of extending human lifespan — remarks that were immediately censored. Kim was present in the entourage, and the moment bubbles as part of the larger spectacle of aligned authoritarian showmanship.
Given these developments, Kim’s birthday message reads not simply as a personal homage but as a public reaffirmation of Russia–North Korea solidarity on military, diplomatic, and ideological fronts.
Risks, Reactions, and the Strategic Stakes
Kim’s glowing letter comes at a fraught moment for Moscow: Ukraine continues to inflict drone strikes and missile attacks deep within Russian territory, targeting energy infrastructure. Putin’s birthday coincided with renewed questions about leadership, succession, and legitimacy amid wartime stresses.
From a global perspective, Kim’s message and its timing underscore Pyongyang’s willingness to stake its diplomatic credibility on the Russian war effort. The DPRK has already declared its intent to develop “additional military measures” in response to increased U.S. presence in the region — a posture bolstered by its growing connection to Moscow.
Still, this alliance carries risks. North Korea’s brutal human rights record and nuclear weapons ambitions have isolated it diplomatically; by jostling closer to Russia, Kim may further alienate potential moderate partners. For Russia, overreliance on North Korean military support could backfire — especially if the flow of arms draws new sanctions or escalates tensions in East Asia.
Conclusion: A Birthday Message With Global Ripples
At face value, Kim Jong-un’s birthday message to Vladimir Putin is a bold display of affection: “closest comrade,” “immortal friendship,” and a vow of unwavering alliance. But beneath the surface lies a calculated diplomatic move — one intended to send ripples across the global stage about where the axis of authoritarian solidarity seeks to head.
As Putin enters his 73rd year, his choice to spend the day working, fielding international calls, and consolidating power amid an ongoing war tells us that the man is as focused on geopolitics as ever. Kim’s message, delivered in that context, reinforces their co-joined strategic trajectory — an axis rooted in mutual needs, symbolic signaling, and a shared ambition to reshape world order on their terms.
0 Comments