1. Kabiru Sokoto and the Borno Lodge Controversy
One of the most explosive claims concerns Kabiru Umar Abubakar, better known as Kabiru Sokoto, a convicted Boko Haram terrorist. Sokoto was found to be the mastermind behind the 2011 Christmas Day bombing of St. Theresa’s Catholic Church in Madalla, Niger State, which left dozens dead. He was arrested, but controversially escaped custody the following day — only to be rearrested about a month later.
The more sinister part of the allegation: Sokoto, after his escape, was reportedly found in a Borno State government lodge, in the company of Kashim Shettima — now the Vice President of Nigeria. These claims suggest a troubling nexus, implying that he may have enjoyed protection or complicity at the highest levels of state government.
However, efforts to independently verify the story have hit a wall: there are no credible or substantiated reports from reputable media or judicial sources that confirm Sokoto was ever found in such a lodge with Shettima. Neither Shettima’s public biography nor court records mention such an incident. Wikipedia, while mentioning Sokoto’s escape and re-arrest, does not include any lodge encounter. Without verifiable evidence, this remains in the realm of political allegation rather than established fact.
2. Nasir El-Rufai: Security, Banditry, and a Failed Ministerial Bid
Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai is frequently criticized for his role in the state’s worsening security issues — particularly the intensification of banditry and communal violence under his tenure. The 2019 Kaduna massacre, where over 140 people were killed, remains a dark stain on his record.
In 2023, El-Rufai’s political ambitions ran into a major setback: his nomination for a ministerial position was nixed due to negative security clearance. According to BusinessDay, security agencies refused to clear him, effectively blocking his Senate confirmation. While some narratives frame this as evidence of alleged extremist or terrorist associations, the publicly available documentation from reliable outlets does not substantiate direct links to terrorism or terrorist funding. Instead, what emerges is a complex debate over governance failure, security strategy, and trust in the security establishment.
Critics suggest that El-Rufai’s hardline rhetoric — including calls for military-style operations in bandit areas and his framing of non-state actors — raises questions about his approach to security, but no credible judicial or intelligence report has conclusively proven that he “had his hands soiled in blood” through active involvement in extremist networks.
3. Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami: From Extremist Sermons to Tech Advocate
Perhaps the most controversial among these figures is Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami, former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy. Investigative reports, especially by Peoples Gazette, have unearthed his past sermons from the 2000s in which he:
Expressed support for Taliban and Al-Qaeda, praying for their victories.
Described jihad as “an individual obligation for every believer in Nigeria” in earlier years.
Delivered public sermons when he was very young (teenager/university student), which he later attributed to lack of full understanding and maturity.
Issued a fatwa during his campus days, with allegations that it targeted Christian students.
When confronted about these views later in his political career, Pantami recanted. He stated that his earlier statements were made “when I was young” and argued that his views evolved with time, education, and exposure. He has consistently denied supporting Boko Haram, despite the resurfacing of his past audio/video sermons in academic studies.
Critically, Pantami has defended his record by pointing to his long-standing calls against extremist violence, travels to conflict regions (like Borno and Gombe) to speak out against terrorism, and the publication of pamphlets denouncing extremist ideologies. He even highlighted that many Christian staff members worked in his ministry, saying he “believes in merit and competence.”
Still, his past remains a point of contention. Many Nigerians and observers argue that even if he renounced those views, the depth of his earlier alignment with extremist language is troubling given the sensitivity and power of his former ministerial portfolio.
4. Analysis: Fact vs. Allegation, Danger vs. Speculation
On Kabiru Sokoto: While Sokoto’s extremist credentials are undeniable, the claim that he enjoyed protection via a Borno government lodge and direct ties to Vice President Shettima lacks substantiated evidence. Without verifiable sources (court documents, credible news investigations), these remain allegations rather than proven fact.
On El-Rufai: There is documented concern over security under his governance, and his failed ministerial nomination hints at mistrust from security agencies. However, linking him directly to terrorism or extremist networks is not supported by open-source intelligence or legal judgments.
On Pantami: His past extremist rhetoric is well-documented, and his own admissions support a narrative of ideological evolution. This raises important questions about redemption, accountability, and the appropriateness of placing people with such past views in sensitive national roles — but at the same time, he has made measurable attempts to distance himself from radicalism.
5. Implications for APC and Nigerian Democracy
What makes these narratives particularly potent is not just the individual conduct of these politicians, but what they signal about the culture and values within the APC (or at least how they are perceived). For a political party that has often framed itself as the defender of national security and good governance, such associations or allegations, whether fully substantiated or not, can be extremely damaging:
Trust Deficit: When a party’s public figures carry baggage of extremism or suspected radicalism, it deepens public distrust, especially in communities already scarred by violence.
Security Risk: Appointing or associating with individuals who previously expressed support for extremist ideologies could pose long-term security risks, particularly if safeguards are not enforced.
Political Weaponization: These stories also highlight how security issues can be weaponized politically. Without clear, transparent investigation, such allegations may be used for partisan point scoring, undermining genuine efforts to hold leaders accountable.
Redemption vs. Accountability: Pantami’s case raises a broader question: Can someone with a radical past be redeemed — and how do we measure that? Should his later work in government, technology, and peace calls be enough, or must there be a formal reckoning?
6. Conclusion: A Call for Transparency and Inquiry
The resurfacing of these allegations — particularly around Sokoto and Pantami — demands not just political commentary but rigorous, independent inquiry. If there are credible links between past terrorists and sitting or former political leaders, the Nigerian public deserves to know, through transparent judicial or parliamentary investigations.
At the same time, we must resist simplistic narratives that paint all controversy as proof of guilt. Some claims, while politically potent, do not yet meet the threshold of evidence. For Nigeria’s democracy to mature, we need more than sensationalism: we need truth, accountability, and institutional checks.
The APC, and indeed wider Nigerian politics, cannot afford to let the blight of past extremism be used casually as a political cudgel — but neither should these allegations be brushed aside. The integrity of leadership, especially in a country grappling with terrorism, hinges on how we address such claims: not just for today’s headlines, but for the nation’s future.
0 Comments