Somaliland is a geopolitical enigma. Sitting at the entrance of the Red Sea, adjacent to the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait, this self-declared republic controls one of the most strategically vital maritime corridors on the planet. The region has oil and gas potential, prime port access, and a highly coveted geographic position that superpowers have long eyed for trade, military reach, and regional influence. Yet despite this leverage, some powerful partners have chosen caution over confrontation. Most recently, Israel made history by becoming the first United Nations member state to formally recognize Somaliland’s sovereignty—a decision that has reverberated across African capitals and global capitals alike.
To understand why Somaliland’s advantages are so coveted—and why some states still decline entanglements that should seem irresistible—we must dive deep into the economics, geopolitics, and strategic logic that shape Horn of Africa politics today.
Somaliland: A Strategic Red Sea Player
When Somaliland declared independence from Somalia in 1991, it was left largely unrecognized on the global stage. Yet over the past three decades, it has operated as a functional de facto state with its own government, military, currency, and relative internal stability—a stark contrast to the turmoil that engulfed southern Somalia.
But what really elevates Somaliland’s value is its location.
Maritime Chokepoint Importance
Somaliland lies along the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea, adjacent to the Bab el-Mandeb Strait—a chokepoint through which a significant portion of global maritime trade, including oil and container traffic, passes each year.
Estimates suggest that around one-third of global maritime cargo and a significant share of energy shipments traverse this corridor, making the route vital for global markets and international security.
This geography makes Somaliland a focal point for powers that want influence over shipping lanes, potential military staging points, and regional alliances—especially as maritime security becomes more contentious in an increasingly multipolar world.
Economic and Resource Potential
Beyond geography, Somaliland sits in a region with untapped mineral and hydrocarbon potential. Geological surveys and exploratory works have identified promising oil and gas deposits within Somaliland’s continental shelf and onshore basins. While commercial extraction remains a long-term project, the interest from foreign energy firms and neighboring states signals that these resources could become another lever of influence for Hargeisa.
This resource promise enhances Somaliland’s strategic value: It’s not just a transit route, but potentially a source of energy wealth capable of attracting both investment and geopolitical competition.
Diplomacy and Leverage: Selling Sovereignty
Since 1991, Somaliland has pursued international recognition as a sovereign state, a goal that has been elusive due to the importance of respecting African territorial borders, as well as concerns about emboldening separatist movements across the continent.
Nevertheless, in December 2025, a major breakthrough occurred:
Israel became the first world power to formally recognize Somaliland’s independence, establishing diplomatic relations, signing cooperation agreements and signaling broader strategic engagement.
This move, unprecedented in more than three decades, was more than symbolic. It opened the door to economic partnership, intelligence sharing, and potential military cooperation—particularly as Israel seeks to strengthen its influence in the Horn of Africa and counter security threats emanating from Yemen and the broader Red Sea.
Why Israel Sees Somaliland As Strategic
To many observers, Israel’s move might have seemed surprising—but from a security calculus, it makes perfect sense:
1. Combatting Regional Security Threats
Israel’s strategic interest in Somaliland is tied directly to security challenges in the Red Sea and Arabian Peninsula:
The rise of Iran-aligned groups—especially the Houthis in Yemen—has threatened maritime traffic in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and the Suez route.
Somaliland’s proximity—only a few hundred kilometers from Houthi-controlled areas—makes it a useful location for monitoring and, if necessary, projecting power across the Red Sea.
In other words, having a political partner and potential base near this critical sea lane aligns with Israel’s goals of securing maritime commerce and countering hostile actors.
2. Expanding Strategic Alliances
Under the framework of the Abraham Accords, Israel has been expanding diplomatic ties with new partners across the Middle East and Africa. Somaliland’s recognition fits within this broader strategy of building new alliances, diversifying diplomatic outreach, and gaining footholds in historically under-leveraged regions.
Ethiopia’s Quest for Sea Access—and Why It Hasn’t Fully Materialized
Ethiopia presents a fascinating case study of a geopolitical giant restrained by geography.
As the most populous landlocked nation in Africa, access to the Red Sea has long been an economic and strategic priority. Historically, Ethiopia lost its direct access to the sea after Eritrea’s independence, restricting Addis Ababa’s trade to ports like Djibouti, which handles roughly 95% of Ethiopia’s trade traffic.
In January 2024, Somaliland and Ethiopia signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) granting Addis Ababa access to portions of Somaliland’s coastline at Berbera Port, effectively allowing commercial and naval access to the Red Sea.
This sounds like a geopolitical coup—yet Ethiopia has still not formalized sovereign recognition of Somaliland, nor taken full military advantage of the deal. Why?
1. Regional Backlash and Sovereignty Concerns
Somalia, which still claims Somaliland as an integral part of its territory, dismissed the MoU as an illegal infringement. It called for Turkish-mediated negotiations and later signed the Ankara Declaration with Ethiopia, outlining a joint approach that respected Somali territorial integrity.
Under this arrangement, Ethiopia gained commercial sea access without formal recognition of Somaliland’s independence, effectively neutralizing the need for a naval base while preserving diplomatic harmony with Somalia—a key regional partner. In short, Ethiopia chose diplomacy over confrontation.
2. Fear of Regional Destabilization
Hosting a foreign military base is politically sensitive for Ethiopia’s neighbors. The Gulf of Aden and the Horn of Africa are already crowded with foreign military installations from powers like the US, China, France, and Turkey. Adding an Ethiopian naval presence—particularly one built on contested claims—could escalate tensions and destabilize the fragile Horn security environment.
Thus, Ethiopia’s strategy has leaned toward economic access (ports and trade) rather than overt militarization, which would risk direct confrontation and international criticism.
So Why Haven’t These Powers Fully Committed to Military Bases in Somaliland?
Despite the clear strategic and economic advantages, several major actors have opted for pragmatic restraint:
1. African and International Law Norms
Most African states and multilateral bodies have been reluctant to recognize secessionist movements, fearing a domino effect across the continent. Somaliland’s recognition by Israel has already been met with strong condemnation by the African Union and neighboring states, who reaffirm Somalia’s territorial integrity.
This norm creates political risk for countries considering military bases that imply recognition.
2. Complex Regional Balances
The Horn of Africa is a diplomatic minefield. Aligning too closely with one faction could antagonize others. For example:
Djibouti fears losing port dominance if Ethiopia or others secure alternative access through Somaliland.
Somalia has major regional and global supporters who oppose any arrangement that undermines its sovereignty.
Egypt, already engaged in disputes with Ethiopia over Nile water rights, opposes moves that shift regional power balances.
Thus, potential military partners often choose economic engagement and soft power diplomacy over permanent bases.
3. Strategic Ambiguity as a Tool
Countries like Ethiopia and even Israel sometimes maintain strategic ambiguity—punting on formal military bases while preserving influence through economic deals, port access agreements, and diplomatic recognition. This allows them to hedge against backlash while still projecting power when necessary.
Conclusion: A Chessboard of Influence, Not a Battlefield
Somaliland’s rise from a forgotten self-declared state to a geopolitical pivot in global strategy underscores just how valuable geography and resources have become in the 21st century. Its Red Sea access, potential energy wealth, and growing international diplomatic profile make it a prize that many global powers covet.
Yet these same powers are also keenly aware of the political, legal, and diplomatic risks involved in deeper military entanglements. Whether it’s Ethiopia cautiously negotiating commercial access without provoking war, or Israel recognizing sovereignty to gain strategic cooperation without immediately militarizing, the current state of affairs reflects calculated geopolitics, not blind ambition.
At the end of the day, Somaliland’s leverage is real—but so too is the deeply interconnected web of regional diplomacy that tempers how, when, and if global powers move beyond words to action.
0 Comments