In a dramatic escalation in Nigeria’s ongoing fuel subsidy reform saga, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a groundbreaking lawsuit against all 36 state governors and the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Mr. Nyesom Wike, demanding full disclosure and accountability for how the estimated ₦14 trillion in fuel subsidy savings has been spent following its abolition in May 2023.
This legal action has reignited nationwide debates about public finance transparency, governance accountability, and the role of state executives in improving the lives of ordinary Nigerians—not just collecting larger revenue shares without corresponding impact. Below, we unpack what this lawsuit means, the context behind the subsidy removal, why Nigerians are demanding answers, and the wider implications for democracy and public service delivery.
📌 What Is the Lawsuit All About?
SERAP’s legal action, filed at the Federal High Court in Lagos, centers on the allegation that state governors and the FCT minister have failed to account for how they spent the colossal ₦14 trillion in fuel subsidy savings received through Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) disbursements since mid-2023.
The organisation is asking the court to:
1. Compel full disclosure of how the ₦14tn has been spent.
2. Provide details of the projects financed, where they were located, and their current status (including completion reports, if any).
3. Require publication of public expenditure records that ordinarily should be accessible under Nigeria’s Freedom of Information Act.
4. Urge the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to independently monitor the spending and prevent potential diversion of funds.
SERAP’s lawyers, including Oluwakemi Agunbiade and Valentina Adegoke, argue that millions of Nigerians continue to struggle with access to basic services—healthcare, education, social welfare—despite these massive revenues. This raises serious public interest concerns that demand transparency and accountability.
📊 Why ₦14 Trillion Matters
To understand the scale of what’s at stake, one must grasp the broader fiscal context:
The removal of fuel subsidy—long a controversial policy—has dramatically increased FAAC allocations to states and local governments. As reported, monthly FAAC disbursements soared from approximately ₦760 billion in 2023 to around ₦3.2 trillion in 2024 following subsidy removal.
Overall FAAC revenue in 2024 reached about ₦28.78 trillion, up around 79% from the previous year—a significant fiscal shift with far-reaching implications.
These figures are not abstract numbers. They represent public resources that, in theory, should be harnessed to improve citizens’ lives by funding quality healthcare, strengthening schools, upgrading infrastructure, and supporting vulnerable communities. Yet anecdotal and empirical reports suggest that such outcomes are not evident across many states, leaving ordinary Nigerians to question where these massive funds have gone.
⚖️ Constitutional and Legal Foundations for Transparency
SERAP’s lawsuit isn’t just a political stunt—it is grounded in constitutional principles and legal rights enshrined in Nigerian law:
📜 1. Democratic Accountability
The Nigerian Constitution upholds transparency, accountability, and the ethical use of public resources as fundamental governance values. SERAP argues that both governors and the FCT minister have an obligation to demonstrate that these funds are being spent for the public good, not personal or political gain.
📜 2. Freedom of Information Act
Under the Freedom of Information Act, citizens have the legal right to request and access public records—including details of government expenditures. Recent Supreme Court decisions have affirmed that this law applies uniformly across all tiers of government, including state executives.
📜 3. International Anti-Corruption Commitments
Nigeria is party to international treaties like the UN Convention Against Corruption, which obliges member states to ensure transparent public financial management and safeguard public funds from misuse.
SERAP cites these frameworks as reinforcing the legitimacy of the public’s demand for accountability.
📉 Why Transparency Matters Now More Than Ever
There are several compelling reasons why Nigerians are demanding answers now:
⭐ 1. Widespread Concern Over Public Services
Despite skyrocketing allocations from FAAC, many states still report poor or stagnant outcomes in critical sectors like education, healthcare, sanitation, road infrastructure, and social protection. For millions of Nigerians, daily life hasn’t improved in ways that align with the surge in available funds.
⭐ 2. Risk of Mismanagement and Corruption
SERAP’s complaint highlights a significant risk of mismanagement or diversion of funds. There are ongoing reports suggesting that some state spending may prioritize luxury travels, exotic vehicles, and politicians’ lifestyles over public goods and services.
This perception has sparked broader debates about governance ethics, political accountability, and whether state leaders are fulfilling their fiduciary duties.
⭐ 3. Public Demand for Rights and Social Justice
For many Nigerians—especially poor and vulnerable populations—the removal of the fuel subsidy has brought not just relief for national finances but immediate hardship. High fuel costs have driven up transportation, food prices, and inflationary pressures. There is a strong moral argument that savings from subsidy removal should be transparently tracked and used to ameliorate the hardships of those most affected.
🧠 What Nigerians Are Saying
Grassroots discussions, social media commentary, and community debates reveal a widespread sentiment: if funds are being collected in far greater amounts than before subsidy removal, why aren’t citizens seeing measurable improvements?
Many online commentators argue that governors and local leaders should be held to the same standard of accountability as federal institutions, especially when policies directly affect citizens’ welfare at the grassroots level.
🏁 What Happens Next?
As of now:
No hearing date has been set yet.
SERAP and its legal team await judicial directions that could compel the governors and the FCT minister to open their books.
Anti-graft agencies like EFCC and ICPC have been called upon to monitor public spending more robustly in the interim.
This lawsuit could set a precedent for fiscal transparency in state governance and shape future demands for accountability in public finance across Nigeria.
🧾 Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Accountability
Nigeria stands at a crossroads. The fuel subsidy debate is no longer just about economic policy—it’s about citizens’ rights to know, the ethical stewardship of public funds, and whether state leaders can be held accountable in practice, not just in theory.
Whether the courts will compel full disclosure remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: this lawsuit has pushed fiscal transparency and governance accountability to the forefront of national conversation, with implications far beyond the ₦14 trillion in question.
Nigerians are watching. And they are demanding answers.
0 Comments