The escalating conflict between Iran and the United States–Israel alliance has entered a critical phase, with reports indicating that Iran has begun deploying one of its most advanced long-range weapons — the Sejjil ballistic missile. The move is widely interpreted by military analysts as a sign that Tehran may be shifting tactics after suffering heavy losses to its missile infrastructure during weeks of sustained airstrikes.
Recent battlefield assessments suggest that joint U.S. and Israeli operations have significantly degraded Iran’s missile capabilities, destroying launch platforms, logistics networks, and production facilities across multiple provinces. As a result, the pace of Iranian missile attacks has dropped sharply compared with the opening days of the war.
Why the Sejjil Missile Matters
The Sejjil is one of the most sophisticated missiles in Iran’s arsenal. It is a two-stage, solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile with an estimated operational range of roughly 2,000–2,500 kilometers, giving it the capability to strike targets across the Middle East, including Israel and U.S. bases in the region.
Unlike older liquid-fuel missiles, solid-fuel systems like the Sejjil can be launched more quickly and require less preparation time, making them harder for enemy intelligence and surveillance systems to detect before launch. This capability gives Iran a potential strategic advantage in surprise attacks or rapid retaliation scenarios.
Military analysts also note that the Sejjil is considered a “high-value strategic weapon” in Iran’s missile inventory. Such missiles are usually reserved for high-priority targets because they are expensive, technologically advanced, and produced in relatively smaller numbers.
Iran’s Missile Campaign and Declining Launch Rate
Since the conflict began, Iran has launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and thousands of drones as part of its retaliation campaign. In the early stages of the war, massive missile barrages were used in an attempt to overwhelm Israeli and allied missile defense systems.
However, the scale of attacks has significantly declined in recent days. According to Israeli officials, the number of missiles being fired per attack has dropped from dozens per wave to just one or two missiles at a time.
Several factors are believed to be responsible for the reduction:
Destruction of launchers and missile infrastructure by Israeli and U.S. strikes
Loss of operational coordination due to air dominance over parts of Iran
Possible rationing of remaining missiles to sustain a prolonged conflict
Some defense assessments indicate that more than 60% of Iran’s missile launchers have been destroyed, drastically reducing its ability to sustain large-scale attacks.
Israel’s Air Defense Performance
Israel has relied heavily on its multi-layered missile defense system to counter Iranian attacks. The system includes:
Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 – designed to intercept long-range ballistic missiles
David’s Sling – used against medium-range threats
Iron Dome – primarily used for short-range rockets and drones
These systems, supported by U.S. and allied forces, have achieved high interception rates during previous missile attacks. In earlier stages of the conflict, Israeli defense officials reported intercepting about 86% of incoming Iranian ballistic missiles and around 99% of drones.
Nevertheless, some missiles have penetrated defenses. Independent tracking has suggested that at least 14 Iranian missiles managed to bypass Israeli interception systems in certain attack waves.
When Iranian missiles do evade interception, the results can be devastating. Past strikes have damaged infrastructure, caused civilian casualties, and forced widespread evacuations in Israeli cities.
Strategic Implications
The use of the Sejjil missile suggests that the war may be entering a more strategic and calculated phase. Instead of launching large numbers of lower-grade missiles, Iran may now be deploying fewer but more advanced weapons to maximize impact.
At the same time, Israeli and U.S. military pressure continues to erode Iran’s launch capabilities. If current trends continue, analysts believe Tehran could shift toward long-range precision strikes, drones, or proxy forces rather than sustained missile barrages.
The Bigger Picture
The broader regional consequences are already significant. The war has disrupted global oil routes, heightened tensions across the Middle East, and triggered fears of wider escalation involving neighboring countries.
For now, the appearance of the Sejjil missile on the battlefield is a clear signal that Iran is still willing — and able — to deploy some of its most powerful strategic weapons. But the declining frequency of missile launches suggests the country may be conserving its remaining arsenal for a long and unpredictable conflict.
0 Comments