Ticker

Ad Code

Responsive Advertisement

Hungary Shields Netanyahu: Withdraws from ICC Amid War Crimes Allegations

Hungary's Withdrawal from the International Criminal Court Amid Netanyahu's Visit: Implications and Reactions

In a move that has garnered significant international attention, Hungary has announced its intention to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC). This announcement coincided with the official visit of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Budapest, who is currently under an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in Gaza.

Hungary's Decision to Withdraw from the ICC

Gergely Gulyás, Chief of Staff to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, stated that the government would initiate the withdrawal process in accordance with constitutional and international law. He emphasized that Hungary had ratified the Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the ICC, in 2001 but had not incorporated it into national legislation, thereby limiting its legal applicability within the country. 

The formal withdrawal process involves passing legislation and notifying the United Nations, with the withdrawal taking effect one year after notification. 

Context of Netanyahu's Visit

Prime Minister Netanyahu's visit to Hungary comes in the wake of the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants against him and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in November 2024. The warrants accuse them of war crimes and crimes against humanity during Israel's military operations in Gaza. Both Israeli officials have denied the charges, labeling them as antisemitic. 

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has been a vocal critic of the ICC's actions, describing the warrants as "brazen, cynical and completely unacceptable." He asserted that Hungary would not enforce the warrant against Netanyahu, reflecting the strong diplomatic ties and mutual support between Hungary and Israel. 

International Reactions and Implications

Hungary's decision to withdraw from the ICC has elicited varied responses from the international community. The European Union Commission expressed regret over the move, noting that withdrawal only takes effect a year after notification and does not negate obligations for cooperation during that period. 

Human rights organizations have also voiced concerns. Human Rights Watch urged Hungary to arrest Netanyahu in compliance with its obligations as an ICC member state. Similarly, Amnesty International called on European and global leaders to press Hungary to fulfill its international legal responsibilities. 

As Hungary proceeds with its withdrawal from the ICC, the move is likely to have significant implications for its international relationships and its stance on international justice mechanisms. The decision underscores the complex interplay between national interests, international law, and diplomatic alliances.


Post a Comment

0 Comments