How Ibadan Shielded Yoruba Monarchs from the Title of “Emir” — Olubadan-Designate Ladoja Shares Vision for Modern Traditions
Rasheed Adewolu Ladoja, the Olubadan-designate of Ibadanland, has recently stirred important conversations about Yoruba traditional monarchy, identity, and history. During a courtesy visit from the Olugbon of Orile-Igbon, Oba Francis Alao, Ladoja reminded the public that Ibadan played a decisive role in preserving the title “Oba” across Yorubaland — asserting that without Ibadan’s influence, many Yoruba monarchs might now bear the title “Emir.” This statement, while deeply symbolic, also ties into wider debates about tradition, modernisation, and the evolving relevance of monarchs in contemporary Nigeria. In this blog post, I examine Ladoja’s claim, unpack the historical context, assess recent developments around chieftaincy reforms, and explore what this tells us about Yoruba identity and governance today.
Historical Context: Oba vs. Emir in Nigeria
To understand Ladoja’s remarks, it helps to place them in historical and political context. In many parts of Northern Nigeria, the title “Emir” is used for traditional rulers whose authority was either established or consolidated under Islamic influence and colonial administrative structures. In contrast, among the Yoruba in the Southwest, the title “Oba” has deep roots in indigenous governance systems, often tied to pre-colonial city-states, kingdoms, oral tradition, and lineage.
Colonial administration reshaped many traditional institutions across Nigeria. In some areas, the British and other colonial powers co-opted or redefined traditional rulers, sometimes installing or promoting rulers under titles compatible with their administrative systems. In some of these instances, local rulers adopted or were given titles like “Emir” to align with how colonial or Islamic institutions in the North functioned.
Ladoja’s claim is that Ibadan, as a major Yoruba city and power centre, played a critical role in resisting or preventing the drift toward usage of “Emir” among Yoruba monarchs — preserving Yoruba traditional norms and identity.
What Ladoja Actually Said
According to several recent reports:
During a courtesy visit in Ibadan, Ladoja emphasized that “without the influence of Ibadan, the traditional title of the entire Obas in Yoruba land would have been ‘Emir.’”
He stressed that history is clear about Ibadan’s role in safeguarding Yoruba traditions.
He also used the platform to call for unity among Yoruba monarchs and urged modernization in line with preserving heritage.
On security and traditional administration, Ladoja warned that local chiefs such as Baales and Mogajis must reside within their domains, and would be held accountable for security lapses.
Recent Developments: Chieftaincy Law, Succession, and the Olubadan Designation
Ladoja’s comments come at a time when several important developments have taken place in the chieftaincy system in Ibadanland and Oyo State more broadly:
1. Chieftaincy Law Reforms (2023-2024)
The Oyo State House of Assembly passed a revised Olubadan Chieftaincy Declaration, which Governor Seyi Makinde signed into law. This law amended Sections of the previous declaration to include provisions such as requirement of beaded crowns for certain Obas, clearer rules on who is eligible to become Olubadan, and delineations of roles among high chiefs.
Some high chiefs were elevated to “beaded crown Obas,” a change that stirred debate and criticism. Ladoja himself expressed reservations about elevating high chiefs to full Oba status, emphasizing that tradition should not be altered without necessity.
2. Succession of the Olubadan Stool
Oba Owolabi Olakulehin, the 43rd Olubadan of Ibadan, passed away on 7 July 2025 at age 90.
Following his death, Ladoja, who held the title Otun Olubadan (the highest position in the civil line), became the most senior chief in the rotational Olubadan succession system and is now the 44th Olubadan-designate.
In August 2024, Ladoja accepted the ceremonial beaded crown, an important step under the revised chieftaincy law. This was seen as fulfilling part of the rule change that only beaded crown Obas are eligible for ascent to Olubadan. And Ladoja has publicly stated his intention to assume the throne when the time comes.
3. Tensions and Disputes
The reform and elevation of certain chiefs generated some disagreements among traditional rulers. Some high chiefs elevated to Oba status reportedly distanced themselves from meetings or deliberations around the Olubadan stool.
Ladoja has called for the resolution of rifts and emphasized unity, stressing that historical narratives and misunderstandings, often pushed by supporters, fuel unnecessary conflict among Yoruba monarchs.
Analysis: Is Ladoja’s Claim Historically Plausible?
Ladoja’s statement — that without Ibadan’s influence many Yoruba monarchs might be called Emirs — can be interpreted both as a rhetorical device and as having plausible historical grounding, depending on how one views colonial influence, Islamic expansion, and traditional Yoruba governance.
Colonial Impact: The British policy toward indirect rule often involved aligning with existing power structures or installing chiefs under titles that conformed with British administrative expectations. In some parts of Nigeria, “Emir” (or “Emirate”) became the established title under British-Islamic hybrid structures. In contrast, Yoruba political organization had long used “Oba,” with lineages, town councils, and cultural institutions deeply embedded in local identity.
Ibadan’s Unique Role: Ibadan in the 19th and early 20th centuries grew into a major Yoruba political, military, and cultural power. It became a hub of military operations, internal migration, commerce, and resistance. Its influence with respect to culture, political alignment, and education is well attested. If Ibadan had aligned more closely with colonial policies that introduced or encouraged the title “Emir” as in the North, some traditions might have shifted. Ladoja’s claim is that Ibadan did resist that drift.
Religious and Cultural Differences: The term “Emir” tends to be associated with Islamic tradition. While Islam is present in Yorubaland and Ibadan, Yoruba socio-political identity incorporates multiple religious influences, including traditional religions and Christianity. The title “Oba” is less religious-specific in that sense, more attuned to culture, history, and royal lineage.
Counter-Arguments: However, one could question how widespread the risk would have been for Yoruba monarchs to adopt “Emir” titles. Yoruba towns each had their own histories and titles well before colonial influence. Many rulers, especially in more remote or less Islamized towns, would probably have retained the title “Oba” regardless of what Ibadan did. Thus, although Ibadan’s role may have been important, it may be overstated if taken as the sole shield.
Implications: Tradition, Modernisation, and Identity
Ladoja’s statements are not merely historical reflections; they resonate with ongoing issues in Yoruba traditional leadership, state governance, cultural identity, and inter-royal relations. Here are some of the implications:
1. Preservation vs. Change
The tensions around elevating high chiefs to Oba status vs. preserving traditional structure (civil line vs. military line, ceremonial crowns, etc.) show how tradition is being renegotiated. Some see reforms as necessary modernization; others see them as potential threats to the integrity of lineage-based authority.
2. Public Understanding of History
Ladoja’s comments invite Yoruba people (and Nigerians more broadly) to consider how colonial history, political restructuring, and internal power dynamics have shaped tradition. Misunderstandings of history often fuel disputes (as Ladoja noted) over supremacy titles, domains, and ceremonial prerogatives. Clarifying historical facts helps reduce conflict.
3. Unity among Monarchs
As seen in Ladoja’s remarks, there is concern about rivalry among Yoruba kings (e.g. between the Ooni of Ife and the Alaafin of Oyo). Ladoja attributes much of this to their supporters’ narratives rather than the monarchs themselves. If monarchs can project unity, perhaps some of the tension around historical territory, symbolism, and supremacy can be eased.
4. Accountability and Local Governance
Ladoja’s call for Baales and Mogajis to reside within their communities and be held accountable for security concerns indicates a push toward more locally rooted traditional governance. This suggests an expanding role for traditional rulers — not just as symbolic, but as stakeholders in local administration and community security.
5. Cultural Branding and Identity
In a globalized world, maintaining titles like “Oba” (with its Yoruba linguistic and cultural resonance) strengthens cultural identity. Titles are not just words; they carry meaning about who Yorubas are, how they see themselves, and how they relate to Nigeria’s broader mosaic of traditions.
Critical Reflections
While Ladoja’s statement is stirring and opens fresh debates, it's important to keep a few critical questions in mind:
What sources support or challenge the idea that Yoruba monarchs were in danger of adopting “Emir” as a title? History tends to be less tidy. There may be examples of rulers using different titles, of colonial administrators mislabeling or reclassifying chiefs. Research into colonial archives, oral histories, and local ethnic narratives could help clarify how real the “risk” of “Emir” adoption was.
How do reforms affect legitimacy? The elevation of high chiefs to Obas under the beaded crown requirement is controversial. Some see it as necessary modernization and more inclusivity; others worry about diluting historical legitimacy. How do ordinary people – the citizens, locals – see these changes? Public perception will ultimately affect how stable or acceptable they are.
Is sovereignty or authority shifting? With traditional rulers being called to take responsibility for security, etc., are we seeing an expansion of de facto power, or are these symbolic calls? How much real authority do monarchs and chiefs still possess in local administration, law enforcement, or conflict resolution? The evolving role of monarchs in Nigerian governance matters.
Oba Rashidi Ladoja’s recent remarks underline a sense of pride and urgency: pride in Ibadan’s historical role in protecting Yoruba royal traditions and urgency in ensuring those traditions adapt without losing their essence. The claim that “without Ibadan the Yoruba Obas would have become Emirs” is powerful, resonant, and reflexive of deeper debates about identity, history, and tradition in Nigeria. Whether taken literally or metaphorically, it signals that Yoruba people are concerned about more than ceremonial titles: they are invested in history, legitimacy, communal identity, and how their past shapes their future.
As Ladoja moves toward becoming the 44th Olubadan, these debates will likely intensify. Will modernization dilute or strengthen tradition? Will title reforms lead to unity or conflict? What role do monarchs have in a 21st-century Nigeria that demands accountability, legitimacy, and relevance?
These are not just academic questions. They matter for how people feel their heritage, how traditional institutions interact with formal governance, and how community identity is preserved. Ibadan, through its people and leadership, appears determined to keep that legacy alive — and redefine it for our times.
0 Comments