Ex-Texas Mayor Mike Arnold Challenges Saʽadu Abubakar III to Acknowledge Christian Genocide in Nigeria – ‘Prove You Are Not Complicit
In a dramatic and explosive development, former Blanco, Texas mayor and international investigator Mike Arnold has publicly challenged the position of Saʽadu Abubakar III, the Sultan of Sokoto and Chairman of the Northern Traditional Rulers Council, over genocide claims targeting Christian communities in Nigeria. Arnold’s remarks, conveyed via his X account and in recent Nigerian media interviews, emphasise that the systematic killing and displacement of Christians—and peaceful Muslims who refuse jihadist demands— constitutes a genocide under international law.
The Core Claim
Arnold asserts that the attacks on Christian-majority villages in Nigeria’s Middle Belt and northern states are not isolated “farmer-herder conflicts” but part of a long-running, coordinated campaign of terror. According to his account:
He has conducted years of research and multiple investigative missions in Nigeria—visiting internally displaced persons (IDP) camps and speaking with survivors.
He alleges the number of victims is staggeringly high (millions displaced, thousands killed), and the Nigerian government has either facilitated or failed to respond meaningfully.
On this basis, he formally challenged the Sultan of Sokoto: “Prove you are not complicit.” He demands acknowledgement, accountability and action.
Sultan’s Position & the Push-back
In contrast, the Sultan (via his council) and others such as Reno Omokri reject the term “genocide” as inaccurate in the Nigerian context. According to reporting:
Omokri said that by the legal definition, genocide requires state-sponsored deliberate eradication of a protected group; he argued the claims do not meet that threshold in Nigeria.
The Sultan’s council likewise described the genocide narrative as “baseless” and warned it risks inflaming sectarian tensions.
In response to Arnold’s claims, some Nigerian analysts and media outlets accused him of misrepresenting the conflict, emphasizing the multi-causal nature of violence in Nigeria (ethnic, resource-based, criminal) rather than purely religious genocide.
Why This Matters—and Why It’s Timely
1. Global Spotlight & Diplomatic Pressure
With increasing global commentary—such as U.S. Congressman Riley Moore calling Nigeria “the deadliest place in the world to be a Christian” —the debate over whether the violence qualifies as “genocide” carries major diplomatic ramifications. The Sultan’s position influences how Nigeria is perceived and how external actors respond.
2. Victims and Terminology
Arnold emphasises this is not simply semantics. He argues: “Don’t let liars twist words to deceive you or diminish the truth of what’s going on in Nigeria.” His point: recognising the correct term—whether “genocide” or “targeted massacre”—matters for justice, accountability, funding, protection and international intervention.
3. Accountability and Reconciliation
By challenging the Sultan of Sokoto—the “spiritual leader” of Nigerian Muslims and respected traditional ruler—Arnold is raising the stakes beyond Christian victimhood. He is calling on broader Muslim leadership to endorse transparency, end silence, and cooperate in restoring safety.
4. Inter-faith Sensitivity
Although Arnold speaks of a Christian genocide, he also takes care to note: “Peaceful Muslims who equally deserve to be mourned … Martyrs in their own right.” This indicates his framing is not of Christian vengeance, but broader humanitarian concern. Yet the Sultan’s rejection and Nigerian media’s caution reveal the delicate balance of religious and ethnic narratives in Nigeria’s crisis.
Sample Expanded Narrative for Blog Post
The very seat of religious and traditional Muslim leadership in Nigeria—the Sultanate of Sokoto—is now being directly challenged on its silence. In his open letter and X-post, Mike Arnold declared:
> “You will never succeed in shutting the world out of the deep darkness that has befallen Nigeria.”
In addressing Sultan Saʽadu Abubakar III, Arnold demanded transparency and accountability:
“Prove you are not complicit in this genocide by acknowledging it, by calling out the perpetrators, by leading your community in protection of Christians and Muslims alike.”
Arnold’s re-entry into Nigerian headlines comes amid mounting evidence that Christian-majority farming communities in Benue, Plateau and surrounding states have been repeatedly attacked, displaced or killed—and with scant national media attention, let alone governmental remediation. In his investigation, Arnold claims he visited many of the IDP camps—some reportedly not officially recognised by the government—where hunger, disease and despair were rife. He argues the Nigerian state’s denial or minimisation of the violence is part of the crime.
Against this backdrop, the Sultan’s outright rejection of the genocide label creates a chasm. Many in Nigeria and abroad wonder: if the country’s foremost Muslim traditional ruler refuses to acknowledge the scale of the crisis, how can trust be restored? Arnold says the choice is simple: stand with victims, or be on record as complicit.
How You as a Reader Can Engage
Share this story: Awareness is the first step. Post survivor testimonies, link to credible human-rights organisations.
Demand answers: Ask Nigerian leaders, religious authorities, and international bodies for independent investigations.
Support survivors: Consider donations to credible relief agencies working in Nigeria’s Middle Belt and IDP camps, across faiths.
Promote reconciliation: Encourage stories of Christians and Muslims working together for peace—avoid polarising language that deepens divisions.
The confrontation between Mike Arnold and the Sultan of Sokoto is more than just rhetoric—it marks a potential turning point in Nigeria’s struggle with religiously-timed violence. Whether the term “genocide” is adopted officially or not, the world is watching—and the victims are waiting for acknowledgment, justice and a path to lasting peace.
0 Comments