I have just received notice of a new ₦200 billion (two hundred billion naira) defamation lawsuit filed against me by Godswill Akpabio. The suit accuses me of defamation over sexual harassment allegations I previously made against him. But as I reflect on this event, I see not merely a legal action — I see an opportunity to finally bring truth, accountability, and justice into the open.
From Senate Silence to Court Papers: The Long Road to Due Process
Earlier this year, I submitted a formal petition to the upper legislative chamber, accusing Godswill Akpabio of sexual harassment. I detailed instances where he allegedly made unwelcome advances, some in his office, some at his residence, even when my husband accompanied me.
But instead of a fair hearing, I met institutional silence. My complaint was referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges — the same committee that later recommended my suspension from the Senate. I was denied a chance to present my case meaningfully, under the pretext that a separate civil suit had already been filed by Akpabio’s wife.
According to Senate rules, this forced me into a legal limbo — unable to go to court but also unable to receive institutional justice. What was meant to be an internal resolution ended up obstructing the very path to truth.
I was suspended. My voice was silenced. But the allegations did not disappear. And, importantly, the truth does not depend on the goodwill of those in power — it depends on evidence, open scrutiny, and fair trial.
Now, with Akpabio’s defamation suit, the matter is back in lawful, public court. And for the first time since I raised these allegations, I have a real opportunity to be heard.
What the Suit Means — For Me, The Accused, and the Court of Public Opinion
The ₦200 billion suit filed by Godswill Akpabio at the Federal Capital Territory High Court (FCT High Court), Abuja, seeks damages over what he claims are “malicious” and “defamatory” charges against him.
In his motion, he requested that I be served via substituted means — through the clerk of the National Assembly — because he argued personal service was not feasible. The court granted the request on 6 November 2025.
I have publicly expressed that I welcome the suit. Because although it appears adversarial, it provides the legal platform I was denied by the Senate. No longer can my allegations be brushed aside under parliamentary immunity or internal procedure. I now have the chance to prove, under oath and before competent courts, exactly what happened — all attempts at hush, delay, or intimidation notwithstanding.
In my words: “See you in court, Godswill Akpabio.” This is my firm commitment.
The Stakes Are National — More Than Two Individuals
This is not just about me and one man. The outcome of this suit, the proceedings, and the court’s decision will ripple far beyond the courtroom. It will tell Nigerians — especially women in politics and public service — whether allegations of harassment and power abuse will be treated with seriousness, or whether the courts will be just another venue for silencing.
Some context: after I filed the petition in March 2025, the Ethics Committee dismissed it for alleged procedural lapses, and I was suspended for six months; allowances removed, office access withdrawn, and my voice effectively stifled.
That suspension sparked widespread condemnations from civil society actors, women’s groups, and activists. Many argued that the Ethics Committee was evidently “not fit for purpose,” and that the entire process illustrated systemic bias against women in positions of power.
Now, with this suit, the questions are urgent: Will the judiciary rise to ensure fairness and justice? Will public scrutiny pressure transparency? Or will reputational power continue to shield wrongdoing?
My Response: Readiness to Present Evidence — Not Threats
Let me be clear: this is not about revenge or politics. This is about truth, responsibility, and accountability. I stand ready to present credible evidence — messages, testimonies, records of harassment, and any documentation required.
I want justice. I want my name cleared — or, if wrong, proper accountability. Either way, the truth must come out.
I understand the stakes. I understand what’s at risk. But what I do not understand is why the journey to justice must begin in exile — through suspension, institutional neglect, and public smearing — rather than through serious inquiry, fair hearing, and respect for fundamental rights.
This suit marks a turning point — not only in my case, but potentially for Nigeria’s legislative culture.
What the Public Must Watch — Key Dates & What To Expect
The suit was filed on 5 December 2025 in the FCT High Court, Abuja, with service approved via the National Assembly’s clerk.
I expect formal court proceedings to commence by January 2026. This will be the first time allegations will be tested in court, rather than dismissed internally at the Senate.
I will present extensive evidence. I encourage all relevant stakeholders — colleagues, civil society, constituents, and citizens — to pay attention and demand transparency.
Final Word: This Is Bigger Than Us, It’s About Nigeria’s Future
I accept this suit not out of fear, but out of determination. I accept it because I believe in truth. I accept it because I believe my generation — especially young women — should not be silenced by fear, intimidation, or institutional dysfunction.
So yes — I say to the Senate President: see you in court.
But I also say to every Nigerian watching: this is not merely a legal battle. It is a test of our democracy, our institutions, and our willingness to stand up for accountability.
If justice is served, it will send a message loud and clear: power does not grant immunity.
If truth prevails, it will pave the way for many others who’ve been silenced, marginalized, or dismissed.
And if this ends up in your timelines, newsfeeds, group chats, and conversations, then maybe — just maybe — we are beginning the long journey toward real reform.
0 Comments