Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Ad Code

Responsive Advertisement

Abuja’s Broken Promise: Inside the Federal Government’s Failed Fiditi Earth Dam Project in Oyo State

Fiditi Earth Dam: A Critical Water Infrastructure Left to Decay — Unfulfilled Promises, Broken Promises, and the Quest for Water Security in Oyo State

Water scarcity remains one of the most pressing developmental challenges in rural Nigeria. Where infrastructure exists, communities hope for improved agriculture, reliable domestic water supply, and economic transformation. Yet in many locales, long‑promised projects have become stark reminders of unfulfilled commitments. Among these is the Fiditi Earth Dam — an infrastructure project in Fiditi town, Afijio Local Government Area of Oyo State, conceived to unlock water access and agricultural productivity, but now languishing largely incomplete years after its launch.
This blog post explores the origins, intended benefits, funding history, political narratives, community impact, and broader implications of the Fiditi Earth Dam, drawing from verified reports, civic tracking platforms, and local media investigations.


What Is the Fiditi Earth Dam Project?

The Fiditi Earth Dam, also called the Small Earth Dam at Fiditi, was initiated as a water infrastructure project under the supervision of the Federal Ministry of Water Resources and Sanitation and the Ogun‑Osun River Basin Development Authority (OORBDA). An earth dam by design, it was meant to impound surface water by creating a reservoir from rainfall and stream flow — thereby:

Providing year‑round domestic water supply to Fiditi and neighboring communities;

Supporting irrigation for local farmers, especially during dry seasons;

Offering opportunities for small‑scale fishing, livestock watering, and improved livelihoods;

Potentially reducing vulnerability to drought and water scarcity.


Such dams are relatively simple earth‑built structures that, when completed, can transform seasonal water availability into a dependable water resource, especially in agriculturally dependent rural areas like Afijio LGA.

Timeline and Project Background

Project Inception and Early Years

The Fiditi earth dam project is widely reported to have commenced around 2011, with the intent of tackling a long‑standing water problem in a region where most residents depend on seasonal streams, boreholes, and distant water sources for daily use. 

Initial federal budget allocations were modest — reportedly about ₦10 million in the 2016 fiscal year — and expected to cover preliminary works. Yet even with this allocation, the work never achieved meaningful progress. A 2018 investigation by Premium Times observed that funds were expended without producing tangible results, leading local advocates and residents to question contract supervision and accountability. 

Ongoing Allocations and Political Oversight

Over the following decade, the Fiditi earth dam kept reappearing in federal budget appropriations under the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP) project codes, including such entries as ERGP28108892 in project tracking systems — indicating ongoing intentions to complete the dam. 

In 2023–2025, the dam began to attract renewed attention. In his mid‑term report to constituents, Hon. Akeem Adeniyi Adeyemi, representing the Afijio, Atiba, Oyo East, and Oyo West Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, stated that ₦1 billion was allocated for the construction of the Fiditi Earth Dam, with ₦300 million released to contractors to “advance the project.” Despite this, the site showed little evidence of actual construction activity or progress.


The Politics of Progress: What the Reports Say

Lawmaker Claims vs. On‑Ground Reality

In mid‑2025, a Sahara Reporters investigation challenged political claims about the Fiditi Earth Dam’s progress. The lawmaker’s announcement that ₦300 million had been paid to contractors was documented — including details that two companies received advance payments totaling approximately ₦270 million. However, site photos and witness testimonies indicated that visible work remained absent, and the surrounding environment appeared untouched and overgrown with weeds, contradicting assertions of an ongoing project.

Local sources told journalists that the contractors mobilized briefly to the site in early 2025, only to leave weeks later with no identifiable construction take‑off. Allegations have also surfaced of budgetary inconsistencies, with federal allocations noted twice under slightly different figures (₦450 million and ₦500 million), raising questions about procurement irregularities and oversight. 

Civil Society and Accountability Calls

Critics from civil society and local communities argue that the Fiditi Earth Dam epitomizes a wider malaise of abandoned public works across Nigeria. Their concerns echo those from other sectors, where infrastructure projects are budgeted repeatedly but deliver little to no practical outcomes on the ground. These patterns reflect poor oversight mechanisms, delayed contractor performance, funding shortages, and lapses in public accountability that ultimately degrade public trust.


Eyemark Tracking: What Does the Data Show?

Monitoring platforms such as Eyemark.ng — which track federal capital projects — list the Fiditi Earth Dam project under ERGP codes with a status that shows minimal completion (around 1%) and unclear progress. This aligns with on‑site observations and community accounts of stalled developments, further supporting concerns that the dam remains largely unrealized despite continued budget line items.




Impact on the Community

Water Scarcity and Daily Hardship

The absence of a functional dam in Fiditi has left residents to rely on seasonal water sources, boreholes, and privately managed wells — supplies that often dry up or become unreliable during dry seasons. A 2021 Campus Reporter piece noted that nearly ten years after commencement, the project was effectively abandoned, and inhabitants continued to struggle with water shortages that hinder domestic and agricultural use. 

Without dependable irrigation, farmers cannot fully exploit rain‑dependent agriculture, which limits planting seasons and yields, constraining both food security and household incomes. Moreover, the lack of a central water body inhibits opportunities for fishing or small livestock watering — activities that boost rural economies when water resources are available.

Flooding Risks Without Channelization

While the earth dam’s construction stalls, the region still faces natural water management challenges. Oyo State has experienced episodes of flooding connected to inadequate channelization of streams near Fiditi. For example, a heavy rain event in September 2025 caused significant property damage to homes and farms in the town, highlighting the urgent need for structured water control solutions. 


Lessons from Other Water Projects in Oyo State

Fiditi’s struggles are not isolated. Nearby water infrastructure initiatives like the Okugba Dam have also lagged chronically, with reports showing decades‑long incompletion and inconsistent spending patterns on water supply schemes in Ibarapa North and surrounding areas. These cases point to systemic issues in state and federal water project management, including under‑disbursement, shifting political priorities, and neglect of critical rural water needs.

Why Completion Matters — and What’s Needed Now

Economic and Social Benefits

If the Fiditi Earth Dam were completed and operational, it could:

Ensure year‑round potable water access for thousands of residents;

Boost agricultural productivity and expand dry‑season farming;

Create opportunities for aquaculture and livestock management;

Reduce dependence on contaminated or unreliable sources, improving public health;

Build resilience against climate variability.


Policy and Accountability Suggestions

To transform the Fiditi Earth Dam from promise to reality, several key actions are crucial:

1. Transparent Contracting and Monitoring — Publish contract details, timelines, and milestones for community scrutiny.


2. Civil Society Engagement — Strengthen local participation in supervising expenditures and delivery.


3. Independent Audits — Invite anti‑corruption agencies to audit the financial trail and performance results.


4. Government Commitment Beyond Rhetoric — Secure sustained funding and enforce execution timelines.

Conclusion: A Symbol of Promise Unfulfilled

The Fiditi Earth Dam represents both the potential of rural water infrastructure and the pitfalls of poor execution. Once envisioned as a lifeline for water security in Afijio Local Government, it now stands — in reports and on the ground — as a reminder of incomplete promises and the consequences of inadequate accountability.

For the people of Fiditi, water remains life — and the need to complete this dam transcends political talking points. It is a developmental imperative.



Post a Comment

0 Comments