Nigeria’s political theatre is rarely quiet, but when the noise suddenly dies down, it is often because a deal has been struck behind closed doors. The recent drama surrounding the attempted impeachment of Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, is a textbook example of how power, proximity to the presidency, and strategic retreats shape political outcomes in Nigeria—far more than press conferences or legislative theatrics ever will.
Despite weeks of tension, media speculation, and coordinated alarmism from political actors aligned with former Rivers State Governor and current Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, the impeachment process has effectively collapsed. Not officially—at least not yet—but tactically, strategically, and politically, it is over.
What Nigerians are witnessing now is not momentum, but damage control.
The Myth of Legislative Independence in the Rivers Crisis
The Rivers State House of Assembly (RSHA) has been presented by certain interests as an autonomous institution responding to alleged constitutional breaches. However, seasoned observers of Rivers politics know better. For nearly a decade, the Assembly functioned less as an independent arm of government and more as an extension of executive power under Wike’s administration. That political DNA has not changed overnight.
When two RSHA members reportedly withdrew from the impeachment process, social media erupted with confusion. Some interpreted the move as loyalty to Governor Fubara. That interpretation misses the point entirely. These lawmakers are widely known political loyalists of Wike. Their withdrawal was not ideological; it was tactical.
In Nigerian politics, retreat does not always mean defeat—until it does.
The Court Injunction Narrative: A Familiar Nigerian Script
One of the most telling elements of this saga is the sudden emergence of claims that shadowy actors were seeking court injunctions to halt the impeachment. This “alarm” was amplified aggressively, despite the absence of verifiable court filings at the time.
For legal analysts, this tactic is familiar. When political actors want to step back without admitting defeat, they often hide behind the judiciary—invoking “respect for the rule of law” as a convenient exit strategy.
It is not that the courts should not be respected. They should. But Nigerians have seen this playbook before:
1. Create tension
2. Signal resolve
3. Quietly retreat
4. Blame the courts
This pattern has played out in previous legislative crises across Nigeria, from Plateau to Zamfara to Edo.
Why Presidential Access Changed Everything
Perhaps the most decisive factor in this unfolding drama is access to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
In Nigerian power politics, access is everything. Not public praise. Not media bravado. Access.
While Nyesom Wike remains a powerful political figure with significant influence in Abuja, multiple credible political analysts and insiders have long noted that he does not enjoy unfettered, informal access to the president. Their relationship is transactional, not intimate. Strategic, not personal.
Governor Siminalayi Fubara’s situation is different.
Since assuming office, Fubara has successfully positioned himself as a sitting governor seeking institutional stability, not confrontation. Reports indicate that he has engaged the presidency directly, framing the Rivers crisis as a threat to governance, economic stability, and party cohesion in a sensitive oil-producing state.
Presidents—regardless of party—rarely support prolonged instability in strategically important states.
Tinubu’s Calculated Intervention
While the details of private conversations remain private—as they should—the outcome is visible. After engagements with Fubara, President Tinubu reportedly reached out to Wike directly.
This call changed the temperature of Rivers politics overnight.
Suddenly:
The aggressive rhetoric softened
Public appearances became calmer
The impeachment timeline lost urgency
New distractions emerged
Presidential interventions in state crises are not new. Tinubu himself has publicly emphasized stability, internal party management, and avoiding avoidable political fires—especially in his first term.
From a strategic standpoint, allowing an impeachment war in Rivers would have undermined:
Federal economic interests
Security coordination
APC-PDP elite balance
The president’s image as a stabilizer
The message, reportedly, was simple: stand down.
Why Wike Cannot Admit Defeat
Political strongmen rarely admit defeat openly. Their power thrives on perception. This is why the current strategy is not confrontation, but controlled withdrawal.
By engineering a scenario where:
Lawmakers withdraw quietly
Legal obstacles are cited
Court processes are invoked
Wike’s camp hopes to preserve the illusion of strength while exiting a battle they can no longer win.
But make no mistake—this is not a draw.
In power politics, whoever forces the other side to retreat without achieving their objective has won.
The Six-Month Suspension That Changed Rivers Politics
No serious analysis of this crisis can ignore the controversial six-month political intervention that altered Rivers’ power dynamics early in Fubara’s tenure. That decision—widely debated by constitutional lawyers and political commentators—shifted influence structures in ways that emboldened old power centers instead of neutralizing them.
Ironically, that intervention may have created the very monster now threatening stability.
Power, once expanded, always seeks further expansion.
Tinubu’s Dilemma: Stability vs Political Debt
President Tinubu now faces a delicate balancing act:
Supporting an incumbent governor aligned with governance stability
Avoiding a direct political fallout with a powerful ally
This is not unique to Rivers. Nigerian presidents have faced similar dilemmas since 1999. The difference is how decisively they choose institutions over individuals.
For now, Tinubu appears to have chosen peace over provocation.
What Comes Next in Rivers State
The impeachment process may not be “officially” canceled yet, but politically, it is dead on arrival. What remains is theatre—slow, deliberate, face-saving theatre.
Nigerians should expect:
More procedural delays
More legal references
More media spin
But not impeachment.
Governor Fubara survives this round not because of noise, but because of strategy, timing, and access.
Final Thoughts: Democracy Must Be Vigilant
Democracy is not sustained by silence. Citizens, analysts, and stakeholders must continue to scrutinize power plays, question narratives, and remind leaders of past mistakes.
Rivers State does not need another prolonged political war. It needs governance, stability, and institutional respect.
And for all the noise, one fact remains clear:
This impeachment attempt failed—not because of the courts, not because of withdrawals, but because power shifted.
And in Nigerian politics, when power shifts, everything else follows.
0 Comments