Nigeria is at a crossroads. Recent statements attributed to influential Arewa leaders — captured in headlines like
“Nigeria is not for sale, and it’s not for breakup” — reflect more than regional rhetoric: they crystallize a national dilemma that has simmered for decades and now demands urgent public debate. This isn’t just hearsay or political noise — these themes tie into broader national discussions on identity, restructuring, security, federalism, and economic survival.
As the world watches — and as voices like U.S. President Donald Trump make controversial statements regarding Nigeria’s internal affairs — there’s never been a more important time for Nigerians to weigh in on the future of the nation.
So let’s take a deep, informed look at why Nigeria’s unity remains sacrosanct for many, why calls for restructuring will not go away, and why the conversation shouldn’t be reduced to “breakup vs. unity”, but rather about how the country can be fixed for mutual benefit.
The Context: Unity as Both Ideal and Necessity
When political or cultural leaders insist that “Nigeria is not for sale, and it’s not for breakup,” they are tapping into a powerful, emotional narrative rooted in Nigeria’s history and national consciousness.
There’s no doubt that Nigeria’s unity is deeply valued by many. The idea that external forces or foreign leaders (such as Donald Trump or others questioning Nigeria’s cohesion) should influence internal affairs is widely rejected. Northern leaders and coalition voices have condemned foreign threats, saying the solution to insecurity and nation‑building must come from within, not from military threats or intervention by foreign powers.
Similarly, voices like Senator Abdulaziz Yari have been emphatic: “Only Nigerians can fix Nigeria”, underlining that reliance on foreign solutions — even in the face of insecurity — is neither effective nor desirable.
Why Some Nigerians Fear Breakup — And What They Truly Mean
When regional leaders say Nigeria shouldn’t “break up,” they often do not mean the word literally. Instead, the core message many emphasize is:
National sovereignty must be respected
Foreign interference will not resolve internal issues
Unity is still seen as the foundation for economic progress
In many discussions, calls for restructuring are explicitly separated from calls for breakup. Even within Arewa discourse, as far back as 2016–2020, many leaders insisted that restructuring is about adjusting governance mechanisms — not dissolving the nation.
This mirrors a broader national sentiment:
Reform doesn’t have to mean separation — but separation is a leveraged threat from those who feel unheard.
What Exactly Is ‘Restructuring’? — A National Conversation Revisited
Restructuring is a highly charged word in Nigerian politics. To some, it means decentralizing power. To others, it’s a call for true federalism where states manage their resources more independently — even to the extent of state policing or local taxation powers. To critics, it’s often conflated with separatism or ethnic nationalism.
Here’s what academic and policy research says:
Nigeria’s federal structure has become overly centralized, reducing the autonomy states once enjoyed and weakening local accountability.
Proponents argue that genuine federalism — where states have broader powers and control over means of production — could empower regions economically and politically without dissolving the country.
Critics — including former President Goodluck Jonathan — say restructuring alone is not a silver bullet. The nation also needs to address deep social divisions, corruption, nepotism, and ethnic mistrust to make unity work.
The bottom line? Restructuring is not necessarily synonymous with breakup, but rather a remedy for systemic imbalance long perceived in Nigeria’s federal system.
Economic Drivers in the Debate: Centralization vs. Regional Autonomy
Much of the debate is fueled by economic dissatisfaction — the feeling that Nigeria’s wealth isn’t shared equitably and that central government control has led to stagnation or under‑utilization of regional potential.
For example:
Analysts point out that oil revenue centralization has distorted federal incentives and discouraged local revenue innovation.
Historically, in the first years after independence, regions managed more of their own resources, and many argue that this period showed better economic performance and governance outcomes.
However, critics of both the current system and those who want extreme decentralization warn that economic restructuring alone won’t mend social fractures unless trust, inclusion, and equitable governance systems are also built.
Security and Identity: Internal Struggles that Shape Views on Unity
Security challenges — from Boko Haram insurgency in the Northeast to herder‑farmer conflicts in the Middle Belt and militant activity in the Niger Delta — place extreme pressure on Nigeria’s unity narrative.
Many Nigerians perceive these challenges as failures of governance rather than failures of nationhood. In that light, leaders — including northern coalition groups — argue that unity remains essential because:
A divided Nigeria would be weaker against internal and external threats
Shared governance can leverage diverse strengths to tackle insecurity
Foreign threats or military interventions do more harm than good
In fact, significant voices across regions have expressed that no matter the challenges, the cure is reform and inclusive governance, not fragmentation.
Voices from Other Regions: Unity With Conditions
It’s critical to acknowledge that the debate isn’t one‑sided. Leaders from other parts of Nigeria have made their own contributions:
Southern governors issued the Asaba Declaration, affirming commitment to unity based on justice, fairness, equity, and peaceful co‑existence.
Prominent figures, such as former vice president Atiku Abubakar, have called for resistance against ethnic or religious divisive narratives while promoting development and inclusion.
These cross‑regional voices demonstrate that unity and restructuring are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary goals if pursued correctly.
Is Breakup Really on the Table? Public Opinion vs. Political Rhetoric
While political leaders emphasize unity, public sentiment is much more diverse. Platforms like social media and public forums show Nigerians grappling with conflicting views:
Some argue that Nigeria’s unity is superficial and only exists because of symbols like the flag or currency (as seen in grassroots discussions).
Others believe that solutions must be homegrown and refuse foreign intervention of any kind.
A smaller segment even supports complete political restructuring into new federated or independent systems.
These discussions reflect the complexity of national identity, trust in governance, and competing visions for Nigeria’s future.
A Path Forward: Reform, Inclusion, and National Healing
So what’s the path forward?
1. A National Dialogue Beyond Headlines
Nigeria needs a frank, inclusive national conversation — one that moves past slogans like “Nigeria must not break” or “restructuring equals breakup.” These debates should be grounded in fact, constitutional theory, economics, sociology, and strategic governance.
2. Strong Federalism and True Decentralization
Reforming the federal system to genuinely devolve power — while maintaining national cohesion — can empower regions and reduce pressures that fuel separatist sentiment.
3. Focused Solutions to Insecurity
National unity must translate into greater security for all Nigerians — not just slogans. Nigerian leaders must own the security agenda to break cycles of violence and mistrust.
4. A New Vision for Shared Prosperity
Economic reform that leverages regional strengths — with shared national infrastructure and collaborative governance — can help stabilize the federation for future generations.
Conclusion: Unity With Purpose, Not Fear
Nigeria is not for sale. It’s not for breakup. But it is a nation crying out for reform, fairness, and shared purpose. The call for restructuring is not a threat — it’s a reflection of unresolved inequities and unmet aspirations.
What Nigeria needs now is a bold conversation — one that rejects external interference, embraces national diversity, and builds a stronger union through reform, not fear.
0 Comments