The internal crisis rocking the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Oyo State has taken a fresh twist following a controversial social media post by former Oyo South Senator, Rilwan Akanbi, sparking widespread political speculation and deepening existing divisions within the party.
In a Facebook post that has since gone viral, Akanbi shared a thought-provoking aphorism: “When success is built on a shaky foundation, it cannot withstand the test of time.” Although the statement appears philosophical at face value, its timing—coming shortly after the emergence of Sarafadeen Alli as the APC’s consensus gubernatorial candidate—has triggered intense debate about its underlying political message.
Political Undertones and Rising Suspicion
Observers within Oyo’s political landscape believe the post may not be as neutral as it seems. Many party faithful and analysts have interpreted Akanbi’s words as a veiled critique of the consensus arrangement that produced Alli, suggesting dissatisfaction among certain stakeholders.
The APC in Oyo State has been grappling with internal disagreements over zoning, candidate imposition, and power-sharing formulas ahead of the 2027 governorship race. The emergence of Alli as a consensus candidate was intended to unify factions, but reactions like Akanbi’s post indicate that cracks remain visible.
Several commenters on Akanbi’s page were quick to question his allegiance, with some insinuating that he remains aligned with the camp of Bayo Adelabu, former Minister of Power and a key contender who reportedly lost out in the consensus negotiations.
One user directly asked the Senator to clarify his position, highlighting the growing suspicion around his loyalty. Others were more blunt, accusing him of indirect opposition to the party’s adopted candidate.
Social Media Reactions Reflect Party Division
The comment section under Akanbi’s post quickly evolved into a microcosm of the APC’s internal crisis in Oyo State. Supporters and critics alike clashed over the meaning of his statement.
Some respondents dismissed the post as bitterness masked in philosophical language, arguing that politicians often resort to abstract expressions when outcomes do not favour them. Others openly urged Akanbi to either support the consensus candidate or step aside, reflecting impatience among party loyalists seeking unity.
Criticism also extended beyond Akanbi himself to the broader process that produced Alli. A number of commenters questioned the credibility of the consensus arrangement, suggesting it lacked transparency and grassroots legitimacy. This perspective aligns closely with Akanbi’s “shaky foundation” metaphor, further fueling speculation that his message was deliberate.
However, not all reactions were negative. A segment of his followers interpreted the post as a general life principle, agreeing with its philosophical depth without attaching political meaning. These voices attempted to steer the conversation away from partisan conflict, though they were largely overshadowed by the heated exchanges.
Calls for Unity Amid Growing Tension
Amid the escalating debate, some party supporters used the moment to advocate for reconciliation. They emphasized the importance of unity if the APC hopes to reclaim Oyo State from the ruling opposition in the next election cycle.
One commenter appealed directly to Akanbi to prioritize collective progress over factional loyalty, noting that many grassroots supporters depend on the party’s electoral success for opportunities and representation.
This sentiment reflects a broader concern within the APC: that unresolved internal conflicts could weaken its chances against incumbent political structures in Oyo State. Political analysts have consistently warned that disunity remains one of the biggest threats to the party’s electoral prospects in the region.
Silence from Akanbi Raises More Questions
As of the time of this report, Senator Akanbi has not issued any official clarification regarding the intent of his post or his stance on Alli’s candidacy. His silence has only intensified speculation, leaving party members and observers to draw their own conclusions.
In Nigeria’s highly charged political environment, where symbolism and timing often carry significant weight, such ambiguity rarely goes unnoticed. Akanbi’s post, whether intentional or not, has become a focal point in the ongoing conversation about leadership, legitimacy, and loyalty within the Oyo APC.
A Party at a Crossroads
The controversy underscores the fragile state of cohesion within the Oyo APC. While the adoption of a consensus candidate was designed to prevent fragmentation, the aftermath suggests that underlying grievances remain unresolved.
As the countdown to the 2027 elections continues, the party faces a critical test: whether it can bridge internal divides and present a united front, or risk further fragmentation that could undermine its ambitions in one of Nigeria’s key political battlegrounds.
For now, Akanbi’s brief but loaded statement serves as a reminder that in politics, even a single sentence can ignite a storm—and in Oyo APC, that storm is far from over.
0 Comments