Nigeria must urgently confront an uncomfortable question: at what point does passionate allegiance to foreign causes become a distraction from the bloodshed taking place at home?
In recent demonstrations, members of Nigeria’s Shi’ite community have openly expressed solidarity with Palestine and Iran. Such political expression is not entirely new. Reuters footage from Kano in March 2026 showed members of the Islamic Movement marching during International Quds Day while dragging American and Israeli flags along the ground. Similar demonstrations involving American and Israeli flags have been reported in previous years.
Supporting Palestine, Iran, Israel, America, Britain or any other foreign country is ultimately a matter of political opinion. Nigerians are constitutionally entitled to freedom of thought, religion, association and peaceful assembly, provided those activities remain within the law and respect the rights and security of others.
But Nigeria's worsening security situation raises a more difficult question: where is the same level of outrage over Nigerians being killed by terrorists and armed groups?
This question has become even more significant following an alarming disclosure from the Nigerian military.
In July 2026, Operation Hadin Kai said preliminary forensic analysis following a thwarted ISWAP attack in Cross Kauwa, Kukawa Local Government Area of Borno State, identified foreign terrorist facilitators allegedly operating within the insurgent network.
Among them was a Palestinian identified as Abu Ishaq, whom the military described as ISWAP’s “overall trainer.” A Moroccan identified as Abu Thaiba was also described as a medical doctor embedded within the terrorist network, alongside another unidentified Arab operative.
That revelation should concern every Nigerian regardless of religion, ethnicity or political persuasion.
Nigeria is already fighting Boko Haram and ISWAP in the North-East while confronting banditry and other armed violence elsewhere. ACLED reported more than 300 clashes involving Boko Haram and ISWAP across the Lake Chad region during the first quarter of 2026, representing a 30 per cent increase from the final quarter of 2025.
Only this week, another brutal attack in Kaduna State reportedly left at least 30 people dead, demonstrating once again that Nigeria's domestic security emergency remains very real.
So Nigerians have every right to ask difficult questions.
Why should events thousands of kilometres away consistently generate passionate street demonstrations while communities devastated by terrorism, insurgency and banditry sometimes struggle to attract comparable public outrage?
Is a Palestinian life more valuable than a Nigerian life? Certainly not.
Is an Iranian life more valuable than that of a Hausa, Fulani, Yoruba, Igbo, Kanuri or any other Nigerian? Again, certainly not.
Human life must have equal value.
The allegation involving Abu Ishaq should also teach Nigerians an important lesson: nationality must never be confused with terrorism. The alleged activities of one Palestinian individual cannot legitimately be used to condemn Palestinians generally, just as crimes committed by individual Nigerians cannot define more than 200 million Nigerians.
The same principle should apply domestically. Criminality must be attributed to perpetrators, not automatically to entire ethnic or religious communities.
Nigeria cannot afford to become an ideological battlefield for competing foreign interests.
Whether citizens sympathise with Palestine, Iran, Israel, Britain or America, their political loyalties must never override Nigeria's sovereignty, security and peaceful coexistence.
Government must therefore distinguish between constitutionally protected peaceful expression and conduct that genuinely threatens public safety or national security. Security agencies should investigate credible evidence of foreign terrorist infiltration vigorously while protecting lawful political and religious expression.
Nigeria has already paid an enormous price for insecurity.
Our greatest outrage should therefore begin with the Nigerian lives being destroyed within Nigeria.
A society that finds unlimited anger for suffering abroad but little urgency for bloodshed at home risks losing its moral priorities. Foreign solidarity may be legitimate, but Nigeria must come first. National sovereignty cannot survive if foreign ideological battles are allowed to become Nigeria’s domestic conflicts.
0 Comments