Celebrity or Conscience? Why Comparing Wizkid to Fela Kuti Exposes a Dangerous Cultural Amnesia
In an era ruled by algorithms, streaming numbers, brand endorsements, and social media validation, Nigeria—and indeed the global music audience—has developed a worrying habit: confusing celebrity for substance, popularity for purpose, and fame for legacy. This confusion is at the heart of the growing tendency to compare contemporary pop stars with historic cultural revolutionaries. Nowhere is this more evident than in the increasingly common comparison between Wizkid and the late Afrobeat pioneer, Fela Anikulapo Kuti.
To be clear from the outset, this is not a personal attack on Wizkid, nor is it an attempt to diminish his achievements. Wizkid is undeniably one of the most successful African pop stars of his generation. He is wealthy, globally recognized, and has mastered the modern music industry. But success alone does not make one a historical figure, and popularity does not automatically translate to cultural significance.
There is a profound difference between being a celebrity and being a musician in the historical, cultural, and revolutionary sense of the word. That distinction matters—especially for a country like Nigeria, where music has long served as a political weapon, a social mirror, and a voice for the voiceless.
Celebrity Versus Musician: A Necessary Distinction
Forty years ago, long before social media virality and streaming dashboards, records were pressed on vinyl, sold in physical stores, and played repeatedly on national radio. Artists became known because their music resonated deeply, not because it trended for 48 hours. Many musicians of that era, after achieving recognition, stepped away from the spotlight to serve their country, educate themselves, or refine their craft. Fame was not the end goal; meaning was.
This historical context is important because it helps us understand what has been lost in today’s celebrity-driven culture.
Wizkid is a celebrity—an exceptionally successful one. He has played the pop music game expertly. He understands branding, aesthetics, marketing, and audience psychology. His music is built primarily around romance, pleasure, escapism, and lifestyle aspirations. He sings for young people seeking enjoyment, emotional release, and validation. There is nothing inherently wrong with this. Pop music has its place.
However, pop stardom and musicianship, especially in the African historical sense, are not the same thing.
Wizkid does not play musical instruments.
His lyrics rarely interrogate power or challenge authority.
His music does not confront systemic injustice, corruption, or oppression.
Again, this is not a crime. But it is a category—and categories matter.
Fela Kuti: Music as Resistance, Not Entertainment
Fela Anikulapo Kuti was not simply an entertainer. He was a movement, an ideology, and a threat to entrenched power structures.
Fela was classically trained in music. He could read and write musical notation fluently. He played multiple instruments, including the saxophone, trumpet, keyboards, and drums. More importantly, he created an entirely new genre—Afrobeat—a complex fusion of jazz, highlife, funk, traditional Yoruba rhythms, and political oratory.
But what truly set Fela apart was not technical skill alone. It was his intentional use of music as a weapon.
Fela’s songs were not designed to make listeners comfortable. They were meant to provoke, educate, and disrupt. Tracks like Zombie, Coffin for Head of State, Sorrow, Tears and Blood, and Authority Stealing were direct indictments of military dictatorship, police brutality, corruption, and elite hypocrisy. His lyrics named names. His performances mocked power. His existence challenged the state.
The Nigerian government understood this threat clearly. That is why Fela was arrested over 200 times. That is why his commune, the Kalakuta Republic, was repeatedly raided. That is why soldiers threw his mother, the renowned activist Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti, from a window—an act that ultimately led to her death.
Fela paid for truth with blood, exile, imprisonment, and personal loss.
Wealth Was Offered. Fela Refused.
History often omits an inconvenient fact: Fela had every opportunity to become a sanitized global pop icon. International record labels offered him millions to shorten his songs, remove political content, and tailor his music for Western radio formats. He was told he could be “bigger than Bob Marley” if he simply played along.
Fela refused.
Mission mattered more than money. Integrity mattered more than acceptance. Truth mattered more than comfort.
This decision is what separates cultural icons from commercial stars. Fela understood that music stripped of purpose becomes disposable. He chose relevance over riches, even when it cost him everything.
The Myth of Fela’s “Humble Origins”
Another dangerous distortion is the narrative that Fela rose from the gutter. This is false.
Fela came from an educated, elite, and influential family. His mother was a leading feminist and nationalist. His father was a respected clergyman and educator. Fela had access to privilege, education, and international exposure.
What made him extraordinary was not hardship—it was choice.
He chose to abandon comfort and align himself with the poor, the oppressed, and the silenced. He chose to speak when silence was safer. He chose resistance over respectability. That choice made him dangerous to power, and that danger is what made him great.
Why “Bigger Than Fela” Is Historical Illiteracy
In the age of social media bravado, statements about being “bigger than Fela” may generate clicks and debates, but they also reveal a deep misunderstanding of history.
Fela is not measured by streams.
He is not measured by endorsements.
He is not measured by global chart positions.
Fela is measured by impact.
Celebrity fades. Bank balances shrink. Algorithms move on. The applause of today is replaced by the silence of tomorrow. What endures is courage, sacrifice, and contribution.
Fela’s music still inspires protests decades after his death. His lyrics remain relevant under new governments. His influence extends beyond music into activism, philosophy, and African identity. That is legacy.
Pop Stars Have Their Lane—and That Is Okay
It is important to say this clearly: pop stars are not villains. They are free to chase charts, endorsements, luxury, and lifestyle branding. That is their lane, and it serves a purpose in entertainment culture.
But pop stars do not get to rewrite history.
They do not get to flatten the difference between art as resistance and art as commodity. They do not get to equate commercial success with moral or cultural authority.
Music at Its Highest Calling
Those who learned from figures like Fela Kuti and Bob Marley understand that music, at its highest level, is not just about enjoyment. It is about storytelling, confrontation, education, and liberation. It is about saying what others are afraid to say and standing firm when the cost becomes unbearable.
That is why Fela is not a brand to be compared.
He is a standard.
And standards are not measured by accents, jewelry, streaming numbers, or record advances. They are measured by integrity, courage, and what you were willing to suffer in service of the truth.
Final Thought: Memory Versus Moment
History is ruthless but fair.
Celebrities dominate moments.
Heroes shape generations.
Celebrities are replaced.
Heroes are remembered.
Fela Anikulapo Kuti belongs to history—not because he was famous, but because he was fearless.
0 Comments