However, in what now appears to be the most detailed and definitive response yet, Dr. Adedeji Adeleke, billionaire businessman, philanthropist, and father of Davido, has publicly addressed the matter with uncommon clarity, finality, and documentation. His revelations not only dismantle the allegation itself but also expose the emotional, legal, and ethical complexities surrounding DNA testing, minors’ rights, and reputational harm in the age of digital virality.
This is not merely a celebrity rebuttal—it is a case study in how wealth, fame, and due process intersect under public scrutiny.
The Origin of the Allegation and Why It Refused to Die
Paternity claims involving celebrities are not new, especially in Nigeria’s entertainment ecosystem where fame often attracts both admiration and opportunism. The allegation involving Ayo Labinjo surfaced years ago, asserting that Davido was the biological father of her child. Despite repeated denials, the story persisted, largely because Davido is a high-profile figure whose personal life has historically drawn intense media attention.
What kept the issue alive was not evidence, but repetition—a dangerous currency in the digital era. Each resurfacing reignited public debate, with little regard for legal proof or the long-term implications for all parties involved, including the child.
Dr. Adeleke’s decision to revisit the issue publicly appears to be driven not by ego, but by exhaustion with falsehoods and a desire to permanently set the record straight.
“DNA Is Not a Social Media Poll” – Dr. Adeleke’s Firm Position
According to Dr. Adeleke, the matter was never handled emotionally or informally. From the very beginning, the family insisted on scientific verification, not online sentiment.
He disclosed that multiple DNA tests—five in total—were conducted across different timelines and involving different individuals, including Davido himself and his cousin, Bred, whose name was later dragged into the controversy as an alternative theory.
The results were consistent and unambiguous:
Three separate DNA tests involving Davido returned negative results
Two additional tests involving Bred also returned negative results
In totality, the tests conclusively ruled out any biological link between the Adeleke family and the child.
Dr. Adeleke emphasized that DNA testing is governed by strict legal and ethical standards, not internet pressure. This, he explained, is why he cannot publicly release Davido’s DNA profile.
> “I can’t share David’s DNA profile because if somebody commits a crime tomorrow, and the police comes out to say this is the DNA profile of the person, the person will go to jail.”
This statement underscores a rarely discussed reality: DNA data is sensitive, permanent, and legally consequential. Publicly exposing it could create severe security and legal risks, especially for someone of Davido’s global status.
Why the Child’s DNA Was Also Not Released
Equally important is the issue of child protection. Dr. Adeleke noted that he could not release the child’s DNA profile because she is a minor and he does not have parental consent.
In many jurisdictions, including Nigeria, minors’ biometric and genetic data are protected by law, and unauthorized disclosure can constitute a serious legal violation. This fact alone dismantles claims that the family was “hiding evidence.”
The First Test and the Emotional Fallout
Recounting the initial DNA test, Dr. Adeleke revealed that the laboratory confirmed Davido was not the father. The outcome reportedly left the child’s grandmother devastated, highlighting that the matter was never treated lightly or dismissively.
He recalled Davido’s reaction upon seeing the child for the first time:
> “Daddy, I have never seen this girl before.”
Despite this, Dr. Adeleke made it clear that emotion was irrelevant where responsibility was concerned.
> “If this girl is our child, I am taking her.”
This statement reflects a consistent pattern in the Adeleke family’s public life—a willingness to accept responsibility when proven, regardless of public opinion.
Financial Support and a Willingness to Re-Test
Unsatisfied with the initial result, Dr. Adeleke said he personally proposed two additional DNA tests, fully funded by him. Beyond that, he provided accommodation and upkeep for Ayo Labinjo, her mother, and another relative identified as Anu—an often overlooked detail that contradicts narratives of neglect or hostility.
However, according to Dr. Adeleke, Ayo’s mother reportedly left angrily for Ibadan before the additional tests could be conducted. This action, he implied, raised questions about sincerity and intent.
The 2020 Reappearance and the Final Nail in the Coffin
In 2020, the controversy resurfaced when the child’s aunt contacted Dr. Adeleke to reopen the case. Rather than dismissing it as recycled drama, he agreed to yet another round of confirmatory testing.
This time, to counter new allegations that the child might belong to Davido’s cousin Bred, additional DNA comparisons were carried out. Once again, the results were negative across the board.
To address accusations that the results were manipulated, Dr. Adeleke compared them with Imade Adeleke’s 2015 DNA test, which confirmed Davido’s paternity at 99.9% certainty.
> “The profiles were completely different.”
He further disclosed that Ayo’s own sister acknowledged the discrepancy, effectively validating the findings from within the claimant’s family.
Reputation, Responsibility, and the Cost of False Allegations
This controversy raises broader questions about reputation damage, gendered narratives, and social media justice. In Nigeria, paternity allegations often attract emotional alignment rather than evidence-based judgment, especially when celebrities are involved.
Yet, as this case demonstrates, DNA science does not bend to sentiment.
For Davido, whose career spans sold-out global tours, billion-stream milestones, and ambassadorial roles, such allegations carry consequences beyond gossip—they affect brand equity, mental health, and family stability.
Dr. Adeleke’s public intervention appears aimed at drawing a final boundary between verified truth and viral falsehood.
A Final Word: Science Over Sensationalism
In an era where lies travel faster than facts, this case stands as a reminder that not every story has two sides—some have evidence and noise.
With five DNA tests, financial transparency, repeated willingness to cooperate, and corroboration from within the claimant’s family, the Adeleke family’s position is now not just clear, but exhaustively documented.
The paternity allegation against Davido has moved from controversy to conclusion.
And as Dr. Adedeji Adeleke has now made unmistakably clear: DNA is final, facts are stubborn, and truth does not trend—it endures.
0 Comments