In a remarkable twist of political drama and personal consequence, former Nasir el‑Rufai — the ex‑governor of Kaduna State and chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) — finds himself at the centre of intense legal scrutiny and, strikingly, an almost complete absence of public advocacy from those once closest to him.
Exactly one week has passed since el‑Rufai was first taken into custody on the authority of Nigeria’s anti‑corruption agencies following a court order. The events unfolding around him reveal not only the dynamics of legal enforcement but also human behaviour under pressure — especially in political life. What has unfolded raises questions about loyalty, self‑interest, media cycles and the true nature of political alliances in Nigeria today.
From Voluntary Appearance to Detention: A Brief Timeline
On Monday, February 16, 2026, el‑Rufai honoured an invitation to appear before the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Abuja as part of a probe into alleged financial misconduct linked to his tenure as governor of Kaduna State (2015–2023). This investigation reportedly centres on the diversion or mismanagement of hundreds of billions of naira, including recommendations from the Kaduna State House of Assembly in 2024 for a full anti‑graft agency probe.
Rather than conducting a brief interview and leaving, el‑Rufai was detained by the EFCC and remained in custody for two nights as investigators questioned him.
Shortly after being released on bail by the EFCC, he was taken into custody again — this time by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) — under a separate investigation.
Simultaneously, the Department of State Services (DSS) is preparing to arraign him on cybercrime and national security charges related to statements he made during an appearance on a television programme.
In addition, the ICPC conducted a search of his Abuja residence on February 19, a move el‑Rufai’s legal team has described as unlawful and a violation of his fundamental rights. In response, he has filed a ₦1 billion suit against the commission and government officials, challenging the legality of the search warrant used to authorise the raid.
The Disappearing Support Network: A Study in Loyalty and Realpolitik
One of the most striking aspects of el‑Rufai’s ongoing legal ordeal is the seeming silence surrounding his plight — from the very people, organisations, and networks that once stood with him.
1. His Political Party: The African Democratic Congress (ADC)
Despite el‑Rufai’s standing as a prominent ADC figure and his vocal opposition to the ruling party, there has been no major public agitation by his own party colleagues for his release or vocal support since his detention began. In politics, especially where a figure is prominent, one would expect party mobilisation around due process, legal representation, or public protests — yet none has materialised in any sustained form.
This absence raises questions about internal party cohesion, strategic political calculations, and the role of public opinion in shaping party responses. In modern political movements, support tends to be closely aligned with public sentiment and media traction; when news coverage wanes, so often does political energy behind an issue.
2. Arise TV and Media Echo Chambers
El‑Rufai’s legal troubles entered the national conversation partly through his appearance on programmes such as Arise Television’s Prime Time, where his own comments have now become part of the charges against him (specifically under cybercrime laws).
Yet, while news companies like Arise TV may initially highlight events involving a high-profile figure, they are ultimately driven by viewership metrics and editorial priorities. Once stories stop generating significant engagement — especially on platforms like YouTube where media houses monetise views — they quickly fade from front‑page prominence. Thus, coverage that once amplified el‑Rufai’s voice and political messaging has since shifted to other topics.
3. Family and Personal Connections
In the realm of personal relationships, el‑Rufai’s first wife — known on social media for her frequent commentary and impassioned responses to political issues — has remained conspicuously quiet regarding his latest predicament. While public figures often balance privacy with advocacy in crisis situations, the absence of visible support or commentary is notable, especially when compared to her prior online presence.
Similarly, his children — some of whom maintain active social profiles — appear to be focusing on non‑political personal interests rather than publicly advocating for their father. In an era where families of public figures typically use their platforms to rally support or shape narratives during legal challenges, this quietness stands out.
4. The Broader Public and On‑the‑Ground Reality in Kaduna
A visit to Kaduna — the state where el‑Rufai served as governor — reveals that daily life ticks on much as before: markets bustle, commuters move, worshippers fast according to religious custom, and everyday society continues its rhythms. This stands in contrast to the idea of a major political titan whose absence would ostensibly cause significant social disruption.
For many citizens in Kaduna, the primary concerns remain security, economic opportunities, and stability — not elevated political spectacle. This reflects a broader truth in politics globally: prominence in media headlines does not always translate into deep or lasting public dependence or loyalty.
The Ironies and Hard Lessons of Power and Influence
The juxtaposition between past political grandstanding and present muted support underscores profound ironies:
El‑Rufai, once a central figure in national politics and a vocal critic of the ruling party, now faces legal proceedings with minimal visible backing.
His media allies and political networks have shifted attention elsewhere, perhaps wary of reputational damage or political risk.
Family members who once publicly engaged with contentious discourse have taken a lower profile in the face of his own legal vulnerabilities.
Together, this pattern illustrates how political capital and personal loyalty are often contingent, not absolute. It demonstrates that when legal forces and media cycles shift, even powerful figures can find themselves politically alone.
A Broader Reflection: The Human Reality Behind Politics
The unfolding saga around el‑Rufai’s detention and the subdued reactions from his supposed allies points to a timeless lesson about human nature: power attracts attention, but crisis reveals true support. When the stakes rise, some will support loudly, others silently, and many not at all.
Political influence is a currency — one that pays dividends only when the broader public or networks of allegiance see value in defending someone. When that value dissipates — whether due to legal risk, public opinion, or media disinterest — the support net unravels.
Conclusion: A Study in Empires That Forget Their Builders
Nasir el‑Rufai’s situation provides a cautionary tale about self‑perception, political alliances, and the transient nature of public attention. While his impact on Nigeria’s political landscape is undeniable, his recent experience reveals that visibility does not always equal loyalty, and that political relevance fades quickly without sustained support systems and public resonance.
What this episode teaches is not just about one man’s legal entanglements, but about the broader dynamics that govern political life — where media cycles, party loyalty, and personal networks all play ruthless and often unpredictable roles.
The key takeaway is simple yet profound: humility and grounded self‑awareness are vital in public life — for without them, leaders can find their so‑called supporters disappearing at the very moment they are most needed.
0 Comments