Why Political Sacrifice Is the Heart of Leadership: Lessons from Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Game‑Changing Strategy
In the cut‑throat world of Nigerian politics, true leadership demands more than ambition, slogans, or marquee campaigns. It requires strategic sacrifices — decisions that may appear risky in the short term but ultimately secure long‑term influence and greater collective gains. Few political figures in recent Nigerian history embody this principle better than President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whose political maneuvering in the mid‑2000s offers one of the most compelling lessons in selflessness and strategic foresight.
One often‑cited example — frequently discussed in political analyses of Tinubu’s career — centers on a critical decision he made in 2007 that helped reshape the future of Lagos state and, eventually, the nation. It wasn’t just a matter of personal ambition; it was about reading the political landscape, understanding the value of alliances, and making a sacrifice that ultimately built a wider base of political support.
The Crossroads: Senate Ambition or Strategic Sacrifice?
In 2007, after serving as governor of Lagos State and solidifying his position as a power broker in southwest politics, Bola Tinubu faced a pivotal choice: pursue a Senate seat or step back in support of a broader campaign that could strengthen his political influence and that of his party across key leadership roles.
According to documented accounts of the period, Tinubu had obtained and filled out the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) form to contest for the Senate. But as events unfolded, he came to a significant realization. His close ally, Mr. Babatunde Fashola, was positioning to run for Governor of Lagos, and Tinubu understood that splitting his focus between his own Senate campaign and helping his party retain control of Lagos could prove disastrous.
At that critical juncture, Tinubu reportedly told himself, “If I go ahead, I will strive to win my seat while leaving Fashola to his fate.” The implication was clear: his own political advancement could undercut the strategic capacity of his party to win the governorship — a post central to maintaining political stronghold in Nigeria’s most populous state.
Rather than stubbornly pursue his own ambition, Tinubu made what some analysts call one of the most selfless political decisions in Nigerian history. He contacted his ally, Senator Ganiyu Solomon, and asked him to accompany him to Abuja. There, at the INEC office, he withdrew his Senate form and handed Solomon another form — essentially transferring his political opportunity so he could focus on bolstering Fashola’s gubernatorial campaign.
Solomon was reportedly shocked and asked, “For what, sir?” Tinubu’s response was simple yet profound: “We must make sacrifices.” That decision not only allowed Fashola to secure the governorship of Lagos State, but it also preserved Tinubu’s political influence and helped lay the groundwork for future advances in national politics.
Political Sacrifice Versus Personal Ambition
Why is this story so significant, especially for aspiring leaders and political strategists? The answer lies in the broader context of Nigerian politics — where personal ambition often clashes with collective strategy, and short‑term gain can compromise long‑term objectives.
By stepping down from his Senate ambition, Tinubu avoided a potentially costly political split. Had he refused to withdraw, analysts suggest, he could have lost Lagos State to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) — a defeat that might have eroded his political capital and reshaped the trajectory of Nigerian politics for years.
Instead, Lagos remained under his party’s control, and Tinubu’s political network grew stronger. Fashola’s eventual success as governor helped solidify the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) — later the All Progressives Congress (APC) — as a formidable political force in the southwest and across Nigeria. Today, Fashola’s political legacy in Lagos is widely acknowledged, and he has since played significant roles in national governance and political affairs.
What This Means for Political Godfathers Today
This historical account holds valuable lessons for current and aspiring political leaders, especially those often described as “godfathers” in regional politics.
1. Leadership isn’t about stubbornly reaching personal goals at all costs. Sometimes the right path involves letting go of an opportunity that seems promising on the surface, in order to strengthen a bigger strategy that benefits a broader group. Leaders who truly understand this rarely squander influence for ego. Tinubu recognised this early.
2. Sacrifice builds loyalty. Rather than appearing aloof or overly ambitious, leaders who are willing to bend for collective good often gain deeper trust among followers and allies. Tinubu’s decision didn’t weaken his brand — it expanded it, earning him praise and a base of loyal leaders, including Fashola, who acknowledged his mentor’s role in his own rise.
3. Political victories often stem from coalition‑building, not solo runs. Nigeria’s political landscape is complex, with multiple parties, regions, and interests. It isn’t enough to surge ahead individually; success often requires strategic alliances and shared victories that bring others along.
4. Thinking long-term trumps instant gratification. Had Tinubu pursued his Senate seat without regard for the larger implications, he might have lost both Lagos and future opportunities. But by choosing wisely, he positioned himself for continued relevance and, eventually, national leadership.
A Blueprint for Statesmen and Political Players
For the Governor of Oyo State and other influential figures often described as regional “godfathers,” this narrative should serve as a blueprint for leadership that prioritizes shared success over individual gain. The essence of political stewardship is not securing the most prestigious title but strengthening the entire structure of your political ecosystem.
In today’s political environment, where media narratives are powerful and public opinion shifts rapidly, leaders must embody not just ambition but strategic humility. Those who understand how to balance personal aspirations with collective victories are better poised to shape the future of their states and their nation.
Conclusion: The True Measure of Political Wisdom
Political power is not merely a function of winning seats or posting campaign photos. True influence is forged in the decisions that shape the fate of others and the stability of the society you serve. Asiwaju Bola Tinubu’s decision to withdraw his Senate bid in 2007 — so that a stronger, more sustained political future could be built — stands as a rare but instructive example.
It underscores a timeless truth: leaders must be willing to make sacrifices for the greater good. Not only does it preserve political capital, it builds bridges, strengthens alliances, and positions leaders as champions of collective success rather than mere pursuers of personal ambition.
For political actors in Oyo, Lagos, or anywhere in Nigeria, this lesson is as relevant today as it was nearly two decades ago. Those who aspire to influence must embrace the principle that sacrifice, not selfish ambition, is the foundation of enduring leadership.
0 Comments