On November 25, 2026, Atiku Abubakar will mark his 80th birthday. Few figures in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic have remained as consistently relevant, resilient, and controversial as the former Vice President. For over three decades, Atiku has been a constant presence in Nigeria’s political landscape—building alliances, contesting elections, shaping party structures, and positioning himself as a central power broker.
There is no exaggeration in stating that Atiku Abubakar has been one of the most influential politicians in modern Nigerian history. Yet, despite his towering influence, vast network, and immense resources, the presidency has eluded him. Many observers argue that one man, more than any other, has consistently stood in his path: Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
As Nigeria’s political chessboard continues to evolve, the rivalry between these two seasoned tacticians remains one of the defining narratives of contemporary Nigerian politics.
Early Political Roots and the Yar’Adua Political Machine
Atiku Abubakar’s political journey began long before the Fourth Republic. After a successful career in the Nigeria Customs Service, where he rose to the rank of Deputy Director, he ventured into business and later into politics during the aborted Third Republic.
His political ascent was closely tied to the formidable political machinery of the late Shehu Musa Yar'Adua. Yar’Adua’s People’s Front of Nigeria was one of the most organized and ideologically coherent political movements of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Through this platform, Atiku cultivated relationships that would later define his influence across Nigeria’s political spectrum.
Historians and political analysts have often referenced tensions surrounding the 1993 presidential election involving MKO Abiola. There have been longstanding claims that part of General Yar’Adua’s political calculations at the time revolved around the choice of a running mate. Some accounts suggest that Yar’Adua recommended Atiku as a potential vice-presidential candidate to Abiola. While the June 12 election was ultimately annulled, the episode demonstrated how deeply embedded Atiku was within elite political negotiations of the era.
The Obasanjo Presidency and the Rise of Atiku
The return to democracy in 1999 reshaped Nigeria’s political architecture. The newly formed People's Democratic Party (PDP) selected Olusegun Obasanjo as its presidential candidate—a decision widely interpreted as part of national reconciliation following the annulment of the June 12, 1993 election, believed to have been won by MKO Abiola.
In what many consider a strategic balancing act, Obasanjo selected Atiku Abubakar as his running mate. For some observers, this decision was also viewed as fulfilling the long-standing political aspirations of the Yar’Adua bloc, which had played a major role in PDP’s formation.
From 1999 to 2007, Atiku served as Vice President of Nigeria. During this period, he chaired the National Council on Privatization and was deeply involved in economic reform programs, including liberalization policies that opened sectors such as telecommunications to private investment. The dramatic growth of Nigeria’s telecom sector—particularly following the GSM licensing regime in 2001—remains one of the signature achievements of that administration.
Atiku’s tenure solidified his image as a liberal-minded Northern politician—one who embraced privatization, market reforms, and international engagement. Unlike many traditional Northern political figures, Atiku positioned himself as progressive, business-oriented, and globally connected.
A Different Kind of Northern Politician
Atiku Abubakar has never fit neatly into the mold of a conventional Northern conservative. He has consistently advocated restructuring, economic liberalization, and deeper private-sector participation in governance. His campaigns have emphasized job creation, foreign direct investment, and youth inclusion.
Supporters argue that if elected president, Atiku would likely assemble a technocratic cabinet similar to the reform-oriented team that served during the early years of the Fourth Republic. His international connections—built through decades of business and political engagement—are often cited as assets.
Moreover, Atiku is widely regarded as politically generous. He has invested heavily in political relationships, building loyalty across party lines and sectors. His network spans business, academia, media, and regional power blocs. Few politicians can claim to have contested as many presidential elections while retaining such sustained relevance.
Yet, for all these strengths, one consistent obstacle has defined his presidential ambitions.
The Tinubu Factor: Strategy Versus Momentum
If Atiku represents political influence powered by networks and resources, Bola Ahmed Tinubu represents long-term strategic planning.
Like Atiku, Tinubu is locally and internationally connected. Like Atiku, he understands the mechanics of power and the strategic use of financial resources. Both men have cultivated loyalists and political foot soldiers. However, their methods differ sharply.
1. The Strategic Mindset
Tinubu has demonstrated a long-game strategy that spans decades. After serving as Governor of Lagos State from 1999 to 2007, he invested years in building opposition coalitions that would ultimately lead to the formation of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2013.
The merger that birthed APC—uniting ACN, CPC, ANPP, and factions of other parties—was not accidental. It was the result of patient coalition-building. Tinubu was willing to wait, backing Muhammadu Buhari in 2015 rather than insisting on immediate personal ambition.
By contrast, critics argue that Atiku often relied on securing party tickets as the primary pathway to power. His political migrations—from PDP to AC, to APC, and back to PDP—have been interpreted by some as pragmatic flexibility, and by others as impatience.
2. Building Structures Versus Buying Influence
Tinubu is known for nurturing protégés—elevating relatively unknown figures into influential positions, particularly in Lagos and across the Southwest. This cultivation of loyalists has created a durable political structure often described as disciplined and hierarchical.
Atiku, on the other hand, has relied more on transactional alliances. While effective in the short term, such arrangements can prove unstable under electoral pressure.
3. Patience and Timing
Tinubu reportedly spent over two decades positioning himself for the presidency. His strategic patience culminated in his successful bid in 2023.
Atiku’s approach has been more immediate. The belief that a combination of Northern demographics, financial capacity, and elite connections could secure victory has not consistently translated into electoral success. Despite strong showings, he has repeatedly fallen short at critical moments.
APC Primaries and the Turning Point
The internal dynamics of the APC further highlighted the divergence between the two men. During party primaries in 2014, Buhari emerged as the consensus candidate. Tinubu’s backing was decisive.
For Atiku, who had sought the APC ticket, this was a significant setback. From that moment onward, the rivalry between the two political heavyweights intensified.
Tinubu’s survival through periods of hostility—including tensions with Obasanjo-era political actors—demonstrated resilience and tactical depth. His ability to consolidate power while maintaining long-term objectives has consistently frustrated Atiku’s presidential pursuit.
Legacy, Rivalry, and the Biography Yet to Be Written
As Atiku approaches 80, his political journey remains extraordinary. He has contested multiple presidential elections, influenced party formations, and shaped national debates on restructuring and economic reform.
However, the narrative of his career cannot be written without acknowledging Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Their rivalry encapsulates two models of political power in Nigeria: one driven by expansive networks and resources, the other by disciplined long-term strategy and structural control.
It is difficult to imagine Atiku’s eventual memoir without a chapter dedicated to Tinubu—the man whose strategic patience repeatedly intersected with, and arguably obstructed, his path to Aso Rock.
Whether history ultimately views Atiku as a nearly-man or as a kingmaker whose influence outlived electoral defeat remains to be seen. What is certain is this: few individuals have dominated Nigeria’s political conversation for as long or as intensely.
And as November 25, 2026 approaches, one truth stands firm—Atiku Abubakar’s story is inseparable from the story of Nigeria’s Fourth Republic, and from the enduring shadow cast by Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
0 Comments