Selective Outrage and Sacred Silence: How Nigeria’s Culture of Religious Hypocrisy Is Fueling Endless Bloodshed
Nigeria is bleeding—again. And beyond the numbers, the locations, and the horrifying headlines, a more disturbing pattern keeps repeating itself: selective outrage, selective empathy, and a dangerous silence shaped by religious identity rather than human conscience.
In Yelwata, Benue State, more than 200 Christians were brutally killed in one of the deadliest communal attacks in recent memory. Not long after, in Woro, Kwara State, over 170 people—mostly Muslims and other residents—were slaughtered by Islamist jihadists. Both tragedies were catastrophic. Both involved innocent Nigerians. Both demanded a unified national response grounded in humanity.
Yet the reactions—or lack of them—have exposed an uncomfortable truth Nigeria keeps avoiding.
The question many Nigerians are now asking, quietly or loudly, is simple but explosive:
Where is the outrage when the victims are not “your own”?
Counting the Silence: When Condemnation Depends on Identity
How many prominent Muslim clerics, scholars, organizations, or pressure groups publicly condemned the mass killing of Christians in Yelwata, Benue?
How many issued statements, sermons, fatwas, or calls for justice with the same urgency often displayed when Muslims are attacked elsewhere?
Then flip the mirror.
How many condemned the killing of over 170 Muslims and other Nigerians in Woro, Kwara—explicitly naming Islamist jihadists as the perpetrators, without hesitation, excuses, or deflection?
The answer, painfully, is very few.
This is not a competition of death tolls. It is a moral audit. And Nigeria is failing it.
If the Roles Were Reversed, Nigeria Would Shake
History has shown a clear pattern:
If ten Muslims were killed by Christians under any circumstance—even criminal or isolated—Nigeria would erupt.
Statements would pour in by the hundreds.
Threats of protests would follow.
Powerful voices—from religious councils to regional blocs—would speak loudly.
Pressure would mount.
The state would be forced to react swiftly.
But when Muslims kill Christians, or when Islamist extremists kill fellow Muslims, the response becomes muted, cautious, and disturbingly restrained—especially from influential religious figures and northern establishments.
This imbalance is not accidental. It is systemic.
The Dangerous Myth of “They Are Not Muslims”
Each time Islamist violence erupts, a familiar refrain appears:
“They are not Muslims.”
In principle, that distinction may be doctrinally valid. But in practice, it has become a convenient shield against responsibility, accountability, and moral leadership.
If they are not Muslims, then:
Why is there no united, forceful condemnation?
Why are fatwas rare or ambiguous?
Why do influential clerics hesitate to name the ideology driving the violence?
Why does empathy disappear when the victims are Christians—or Muslims killed by extremists?
Silence, in moments like this, is not neutrality.
Silence is complicity.
A Global Comparison Nigeria Refuses to Learn From
In 2013, the Islamist terrorist group Al-Shabab assassinated a Muslim cleric in Somalia. The response was immediate and uncompromising.
The Somali government hunted down the perpetrators.
They were arrested, tried under Islamic law, convicted, and executed.
There were no protests defending them.
No clerics demanded amnesty.
No elders called for “dialogue” with murderers.
Instead, there was unified condemnation across religious and political lines—because the crime violated both faith and humanity.
That response sent a clear message:
Religion will not be used as cover for barbarism.
Nigeria has failed to send that message.
Nigeria’s Culture of Excuses and Moral Cowardice
In Nigeria, extremist violence is often followed by:
Calls for amnesty
Appeals for “understanding”
Claims of marginalization
Religious euphemisms that avoid naming the crime
Rather than righteous anger, there is accommodation.
Rather than moral clarity, there is hesitation.
This is not Islam.
This is institutional hypocrisy.
It is the failure of religious leadership to rise above tribal loyalty and sectarian reflexes. It is the erosion of empathy. It is the normalization of death—so long as it does not threaten one’s own group.
When Other Religions Speak Louder Than the Perpetrators’ Own
One of the most tragic ironies in Nigeria today is this:
Condemnation of Islamist violence often comes louder from Christians and other religious communities than from Muslim leaders themselves—even when Muslims are the victims.
This reality damages trust.
It deepens division.
It fuels resentment.
And it strengthens extremist narratives that thrive in silence.
A nation cannot survive when moral courage is selective.
This Is Not an Attack on Islam—It Is a Call to Nigerian Muslims
Let this be clear:
This is not an attack on Islam as a faith.
Islam, like Christianity, preaches the sanctity of life, justice, and compassion. What is being questioned here is what sections of Nigeria’s Muslim leadership and community have drifted into—a posture of selective outrage and moral withdrawal.
A community is judged not by its scriptures alone, but by:
How it reacts to injustice
How it defends the innocent
How it confronts evil within its own ranks
On that scale, Nigeria’s response has been deeply inadequate.
The Cost of Hypocrisy Is National Collapse
When killings are filtered through religious loyalty rather than human conscience:
Terrorists feel emboldened
Victims feel abandoned
Communities lose trust
Extremism gains ground
The state becomes weaker.
The nation fractures further.
Nigeria cannot defeat insecurity without defeating hypocrisy.
To the Few Who Spoke Out: You Matter
This piece must also acknowledge the few Nigerian Muslims who have spoken up boldly, condemned violence regardless of victims’ religion, and demanded accountability without excuses.
Your voices matter.
You represent hope.
You remind Nigeria that moral courage still exists.
You are proof that this is not about Islam—but about choices.
The Road Forward: Condemnation Must Be Loud, United, and Consistent
Nigeria needs:
Equal outrage for every innocent life lost
Unified condemnation of terrorism—without qualifiers
Religious leaders who fear God more than backlash
A culture where empathy is not conditional
Until that happens, blood will continue to flow—and statements will continue to sound hollow.
Conclusion: Humanity First, or Nothing Works
A nation that mourns selectively cannot heal.
A society that condemns conditionally cannot find peace.
A country that excuses evil because of identity cannot survive.
Nigeria’s greatest crisis is not religion.
It is the loss of moral consistency.
Let love lead—not slogans.
Let justice speak—not silence.
Let humanity come before identity.
❤️ One Nigeria—if we choose to mean it.
0 Comments