Northern Political Influence in Nigeria’s National Assembly: Sharia States, the Middle Belt Realignment, and the Future of Constitutional Amendments
For decades, it has been widely asserted in Nigerian political discourse that Northern Nigeria holds the decisive advantage when it comes to determining what laws are passed in the National Assembly. This belief is rooted in historical voting patterns, demographic strength, and the long-standing perception of a cohesive northern political bloc capable of influencing legislative outcomes in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
However, Nigeria’s political geography is no longer as monolithic as it once appeared. Growing insecurity, shifting regional identities, and the increasing assertion of the Middle Belt as a distinct political and cultural bloc have significantly altered the dynamics of power within the federal legislature. Today, conversations around legislative influence, constitutional amendments, Sharia law, census reform, state policing, and even secession clauses must be examined within this evolving framework.
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the current political structure of the National Assembly, the representation of Northern Sharia states, the rising Middle Belt identity, Southern Nigeria’s legislative strength, and the potential implications for future constitutional amendments.
The Structure of Nigeria’s National Assembly
Nigeria operates a bicameral legislature comprising the Senate and the House of Representatives under the 1999 Constitution (as amended). The Senate consists of 109 members — three senators from each of the 36 states and one from the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja. The House of Representatives consists of 360 members, allocated based on population distribution across federal constituencies.
Legislative power, including constitutional amendment authority, rests with this National Assembly, subject to specific voting thresholds and state ratification processes.
The Twelve Northern Sharia States and Their Legislative Strength
Beginning in 1999, several northern states adopted Sharia law in varying degrees for civil and criminal matters affecting Muslims. The prominent Sharia-implementing states are:
Each of these twelve states elects three senators, giving the Sharia bloc a total of 36 senators in the 109-member Senate. In the House of Representatives, these states collectively account for approximately 135 seats out of 360.
On paper, 36 senators represent roughly one-third of the Senate, a significant voting bloc capable of influencing outcomes, especially in tightly contested legislative matters. In the House of Representatives, 135 members similarly constitute a strong minority capable of strategic coalition-building.
Historically, Northern Nigeria’s influence extended beyond these 12 states due to broader regional cohesion across the entire 19 northern states. However, that cohesion has increasingly been tested.
The Emergence of the Middle Belt as a Distinct Political Identity
The Middle Belt has long been politically located within Northern Nigeria, but geographically and culturally it has asserted a separate identity over time. The region includes:
Additionally, Southern Kaduna (within Kaduna State) and parts of Bauchi, Gombe, Yobe, and Borno are often associated culturally and politically with Middle Belt advocacy.
Legislatively, the core Middle Belt states collectively produce between 21 and 24 senators and approximately 55 to 60 members in the House of Representatives.
The Middle Belt’s increasing self-identification stems from long-standing grievances related to land rights, religious tensions, representation, and insecurity. Many Middle Belt communities are predominantly Christian, with diverse ethnic nationalities distinct from the Hausa-Fulani core of the far North. This religious and ethnic composition has influenced legislative alignments and political bargaining at the federal level.
As insecurity — including farmer-herder conflicts, insurgency, and communal violence — intensified over the past two decades, Middle Belt leaders have often taken positions that diverge from core northern consensus politics.
Southern Nigeria’s Legislative Majority
Southern Nigeria comprises 17 states across the South-West, South-East, and South-South geopolitical zones. Collectively, the South controls:
54 Senators (17 states × 3 senators)
Approximately 180 members in the House of Representatives
This numerical advantage gives Southern Nigeria a clear plurality in both chambers. While the South itself is not politically monolithic, the legislative arithmetic becomes particularly significant when Southern lawmakers align with Middle Belt representatives on issues of shared interest.
If the Middle Belt (21–24 senators) aligns with Southern Nigeria’s 54 senators, the coalition could command between 75 and 78 votes in the Senate — comfortably surpassing the simple majority threshold of 55 votes required to pass ordinary legislation.
In the House of Representatives, a similar coalition between Southern members (180) and Middle Belt representatives (55–60) could yield a bloc of 235–240 members — a decisive majority in the 360-member chamber.
Constitutional Amendments and the Power Equation
Constitutional amendment in Nigeria requires a higher threshold than ordinary legislation. Under Section 9 of the 1999 Constitution, amendments require:
Two-thirds majority in both chambers of the National Assembly.
Approval by at least two-thirds of the 36 State Houses of Assembly.
This means 73 senators in the Senate and 240 members in the House of Representatives must approve a constitutional amendment before it proceeds to state ratification.
In this context, the strategic alignment of the Middle Belt with Southern Nigeria becomes critical. The numbers suggest that constitutional amendments addressing long-standing issues could gain traction if this coalition solidifies.
Key Issues Likely to Dominate Constitutional Debate
1. Sharia in the Constitution
The role of Sharia courts and their constitutional recognition remains a contentious issue. While the Constitution provides for Sharia Courts of Appeal in states that require them, debates persist over the scope of jurisdiction and federal neutrality.
Re-examining the constitutional positioning of Sharia law may emerge as a flashpoint in future amendment efforts.
2. Census Laws and Religious Identity
Nigeria’s census exercises have historically been controversial. Religious identity has not been included in recent census frameworks, partly to avoid deepening sectarian tensions. However, calls for transparency in demographic data, including religion, continue to surface.
Any proposal to mandate religious identity in census laws would likely ignite intense national debate due to its political implications.
3. State Police
State policing has gained bipartisan support across regions due to worsening insecurity. Governors, security analysts, and civil society groups argue that centralized policing under the Nigeria Police Force has proven insufficient.
Constitutional amendment to establish state police structures may receive strong backing from both Southern and Middle Belt lawmakers, particularly given security challenges affecting those regions.
4. Secession Clause and Referendum Mechanisms
Agitations in various parts of the country — including calls for restructuring and self-determination — have renewed conversations around constitutional mechanisms for referenda or even secession clauses.
Currently, the Constitution provides no explicit legal pathway for secession. Introducing referendum provisions would require substantial legislative consensus and state ratification.
The Waning Myth of a Unified Northern Bloc
While Northern Nigeria historically acted as a unified political force, contemporary realities reveal fragmentation. The rise of Middle Belt advocacy groups, religious diversity, generational political shifts, and security crises have reshaped alliances.
Core northern advocacy within the National Assembly may increasingly be limited to the twelve Sharia-implementing states rather than the broader 19-state northern bloc. If so, legislative dominance becomes less automatic and more dependent on coalition-building.
The Road Ahead
Nigeria stands at a constitutional crossroads. Questions around federalism, religion, security, census reform, and regional autonomy remain unresolved decades after the return to civilian rule in 1999.
The legislative numbers indicate that no single region can unilaterally dictate constitutional direction without strategic alliances. If Middle Belt lawmakers align more consistently with Southern representatives based on shared priorities — particularly liberal governance frameworks and security restructuring — the balance of power in the National Assembly could shift decisively.
Ultimately, the evolving dynamics within Nigeria’s Senate and House of Representatives underscore a central truth: political influence is no longer solely determined by geography, but by coalition, ideology, and national interest alignment.
The future of constitutional reform in Nigeria will likely be shaped not by historical assumptions of northern dominance, but by pragmatic alliances that reflect the country’s complex and evolving identity.
0 Comments