Olubadan of Ibadanland’s Historic Call: Why Nigeria Must Constitutionally Recognise Traditional Rulers
Who else can boldly articulate this — if not the Olubadan of Ibadanland? Oba Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja, widely regarded as one of Nigeria’s most influential traditional monarchs, has once again ignited a crucial national discussion: Should traditional rulers in Nigeria be constitutionally recognised and assigned formal roles within the governance system? This question has reverberated across political, cultural, and civic circles, and Oba Ladoja’s voice is at the forefront of this advocacy in 2026.
The Monarch With a Vision
The Olubadan of Ibadanland, His Imperial Majesty Oba Rashidi Ladoja, isn’t just a symbolic figurehead — he is a seasoned statesman, a former governor, and now the chairman of the Oyo State Council of Obas and Chiefs. Known for his profound influence in both political and traditional spheres, Oba Ladoja has made clear, consistent appeals for a clearer, more defined constitutional role for traditional rulers in Nigeria’s modern governance architecture.
On 6 February 2026, during a courtesy visit to Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu at the Lagos House in Marina, the Olubadan reiterated this demand with conviction. According to news reports, Oba Ladoja said constitutionally recognising traditional rulers would strengthen governance, deepen grassroots collaboration, and enhance peace and development outcomes across the nation.
Why Constitutional Recognition Matters
Despite playing central roles in community cohesion, conflict resolution, cultural preservation, and local governance, Nigeria’s traditional rulers currently operate without formal constitutional backing. This means their mandates, influence, and authority — though widely respected — are largely ceremonial and informal.
Traditional institutions historically held formal positions in governance under earlier Nigerian constitutions — for instance, the 1963 Republican Constitution provided legislative involvement through mechanisms such as the House of Chiefs. However, this constitutional recognition was removed in subsequent constitutions, including the 1979 and 1999 versions, leaving traditional rulers without legal roles despite their continued relevance at the grassroots.
By advocating for constitutional affirmation, Oba Ladoja’s position aligns with nationwide discussions among traditional leaders, governors, and even national political figures. For example:
President Bola Tinubu, speaking at a National Council of Traditional Rulers meeting, stressed that traditional rulers deserve formal constitutional roles because they remain the most enduring link between government and the people.
Governor Hope Uzodimma of Imo State highlighted that giving legal backing to the roles traditional rulers play is not about privilege but about clarity — formalising responsibilities that already exist in practice.
Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu has publicly affirmed that traditional institutions are “moral compasses” essential to governance, culture, and social order, reinforcing calls for constitutional inclusion.
These national conversations have given strong political momentum to Oba Ladoja’s advocacy, demonstrating that the argument extends beyond Ibadan to a broader Nigerian context.
Building Bridges Between Tradition and Modern Governance
During his remarks, Oba Ladoja took care to clarify that his push for constitutional roles does not signal a rift with any state government — including his home state of Oyo. He explicitly stated that there is no dispute between the traditional institution and the Oyo State Government. Rather, he believes constitutional recognition would further strengthen collaboration between traditional rulers and elected officials, facilitating more effective governance at every level.
This collaborative perspective reflects a nuanced understanding of Nigeria’s governance structure. Traditional rulers, while not holders of executive political power, remain central figures at the grassroots — interfacing directly with communities on matters of tradition, conflict, social welfare, and local development.
Formal constitutional roles could enhance this contribution — offering clearly defined authority, official coordination mechanisms with government bodies, and legal structures for engagement in peacebuilding, conflict resolution, and community development.
Global Perspectives: Lessons From Other African Democracies
The discussion around constitutional roles for traditional rulers isn’t happening in isolation. Across Africa, several democracies have successfully integrated traditional leadership into formal governance systems:
Ghana guarantees the chieftaincy institution in its 1992 Constitution, providing legal status for traditional rulers as custodians of culture and community authority.
South Africa and Namibia explicitly recognise traditional leadership within their constitutional frameworks, detailing advisory roles and local governance functions.
Advocates argue that Nigeria can learn from these models — creating a governance hybrid that both respects democratic institutions and leverages the stabilising power of traditional authorities deeply rooted in Nigerian society.
Why This Matters for Nigeria’s Future
At its core, this debate is about clarity, stability, and sustainable development. Traditional rulers in Nigeria often serve as first responders to community disputes, peace negotiators, and custodians of cultural identity. Yet the lack of constitutional recognition limits their capacity to operate effectively within formal governance systems.
Oba Ladoja’s call is not just symbolic — it reflects a demand for legal frameworks that match realities on the ground: traditional leadership structures that are influential, trusted, and integral to Nigeria’s socio-political fabric deserve defined roles that acknowledge their contributions without undermining democratic governance.
Conclusion: A Monarch’s Voice, A National Cause
Olubadan Oba Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja’s renewed appeal for constitutional roles for traditional rulers is not only a personal mission — it is part of a growing national movement advocating for institutional reforms that better reflect Nigeria’s historical and cultural identities.
As voices from political leaders, traditional councils, and civic stakeholders align, this debate continues to shape Nigeria’s quest for inclusive governance that bridges modern democratic systems with long-standing traditional institutions. Only time will tell whether these calls will translate into constitutional amendments, but one thing is certain: the conversation has begun in earnest — and no one says it better if not the Olubadan.
0 Comments