Sharia in Yorubaland: Why Adebayo Shitu’s Governorship Ambition and Religious Legalism Threaten Peace, Progress and Unity
In recent months, political discourse in Oyo State and across the South‑West has taken a contentious turn. Adebayo Shitu — a figure now actively seeking to become the next Governor of Oyo State — has drawn national attention not just for his political ambitions but for his vocal support for the introduction of Sharia law in Yorubaland.
This proposal has ignited debate, raised public alarm, and triggered widespread rejection from leaders, groups, and citizens aligned with the deeply rooted values of religious freedom, secular governance, and regional unity. What exactly is at stake, and why does this issue matter so profoundly to the people of the South‑West, particularly Yoruba communities? This blog post examines the implications of this political agenda, contextualizes it within Nigeria’s legal and cultural reality, and explains why many reasonable citizens believe this push must be firmly rejected.
Who Is Adebayo Shitu — and What Does His Agenda Mean for Oyo State?
Adebayo Shitu came under public scrutiny after being identified as one of the people who invited Islamic cleric Sheik Gumi to Ibadan a few months ago. Sheik Gumi’s visits have been polarizing due to his controversial statements on security, religion, and governance in Nigeria. While some argue the cleric is a voice for peace, others view his influence as divisive or extremist. In political rhetoric today, anyone prominently associated with figures like Sheik Gumi risks being labelled by opponents as aligned with religious extremism, a claim that has intensified emotions and discussions around Shitu’s political platform.
Now, Shitu has declared his intention to run for Governor of Oyo State — and his campaign is widely understood to include the implementation of Sharia law across the state and — by extension — what he describes as “Yorubaland as a whole.” It is this aspect of his political agenda that has generated the fiercest responses from citizens, civic groups, faith leaders, and cultural organizations.
Sharia Law: What It Is and How It Exists in Nigeria
To understand the public reaction, it’s necessary to clarify what Sharia law means in the Nigerian context. Sharia law, rooted in Islamic jurisprudence, is a legal framework governing aspects of personal, civil, and — in some regions — criminal matters according to Islamic principles.
In Nigeria, Sharia has been implemented as part of the official law in several northern states since 1999. Starting with Zamfara State, a number of Muslim‑majority states introduced full Sharia legal systems that govern aspects of public life and penal codes for Muslim residents.
Sharia courts and councils operate alongside secular and customary courts, creating a dual legal reality that has been praised by some and criticized by others. However, these implementations have often occurred in states where Muslims are the overwhelming majority.
Why Many Yoruba Groups Reject the Proposal
Yorubaland — including states like Oyo, Ogun, Lagos, Osun, Ekiti, and others — is fundamentally different in religious composition and cultural identity from northern states where Sharia law has been implemented.
1. Deep‑Rooted Religious Pluralism and Harmony
Yoruba society has a long history of peaceful coexistence between Muslims, Christians, and traditional worshippers, dating back nearly two millennia. This religious diversity is widely celebrated and considered a strength of the region’s social fabric. In fact, prominent organizations representing artisans, professionals, students, workers, and cultural stakeholders have publicly stated that Sharia law is incompatible with Yoruba civilization because of its multi‑faith nature.
This sentiment is echoed by multiple pan‑Yoruba coalitions and social groups who argue that religious coexistence and respect for diverse faiths are essential pillars of the region’s cultural identity.
2. Leaders Warn of Division and Instability
Traditional and religious leaders in the South‑West have also voiced concerns. For example, the Chief Imam of Yorubaland publicly explained that the introduction of Sharia law could spark conflict due to the region’s diverse religious demographics and cultural practices, including major festivals from different faiths that coexist peacefully.
Likewise, influential groups such as Yoruba One Voice (YOV) have condemned efforts to introduce Sharia, warning it could weaponize religion in politics and undermine socio‑economic progress.
3. Public and Youth Rejection of Sharia Expansion
Beyond institutional and leadership opposition, grassroots movements — including Yoruba youth organizations — have actively rejected any attempt to impose Sharia law or establish Sharia courts across the South‑West. These groups argue that such measures would threaten cultural heritage and destabilize the region’s peace.
Many citizens view resistance to religious legalism not as intolerance but as a defense of the region’s secular and pluralistic traditions — a way of preserving peace and mutual respect among communities with diverse beliefs.
Historical Lessons from Sharia Implementation in Nigeria
Nigeria’s history with Sharia law has been contentious. When northern states first introduced Sharia in the late 1990s, especially in states like Kaduna, religious tension erupted into violence between Christian and Muslim communities, resulting in tragic loss of life. Critics argue that, over the past two decades, Sharia implementation in the North has not resolved socioeconomic issues like poverty or insecurity and, in some cases, coincided with heightened instability and conflict.
These outcomes fuel skepticism among Yoruba populations about whether Sharia would bring peace or prosperity if introduced in the South‑West — or whether it might instead replicate the patterns of division seen elsewhere.
Global Examples Highlight Complex Outcomes of Religious Law
The concerns raised in Nigeria’s context are mirrored in broader international experiences. For instance, Iran — a nation governed by strict religious rule in the form of an Islamic Republic — has witnessed widespread and sustained protests in recent years. Citizens have taken to the streets to demand an end to clerical control of the state, citing economic hardship, loss of freedoms, and dissatisfaction with theocratic governance.
These protests, some of the largest in decades, signal widespread disillusionment with a system where religious authority is intertwined with political power — a cautionary example of how religious law, when imposed as state law, can become a source of national fracture rather than unity.
It’s also worth contrasting this with countries like Turkey. Although Turkey has a predominantly Muslim population and significant religious culture, it does not enforce Sharia as state law. Instead, it maintains a secular legal framework that has supported decades of relatively diverse governance and economic development. This contrast — between secular systems and enforced religious codes — underscores the broader debate over how religion interacts with governance and national progress.
Sharia and Development: A Socio‑Economic Perspective
One of the most persistent arguments against the imposition of Sharia law in Yorubaland centers on development outcomes. Regions that operate under secular legal systems tend to attract more diversified economic activities because legal predictability and equal application of the law to all citizens are attractive to investors and partners.
Sharia, in many cases, applies differently based on personal religious adherence, potentially complicating civil liberties, investment confidence, and social policy design. While proponents argue that Sharia strengthens moral behaviour and justice, critics point to the absence of major improvements in education, infrastructure, and security in states where it has been fully adopted.
In contrast, the South‑West of Nigeria — including Oyo State — has historically been one of the most economically vibrant and culturally inclusive regions in West Africa, precisely because of its secular foundations and diverse participation in commerce, education and governance. The task before the region today, according to many observers and civic groups, isn’t the imposition of religious law but structural reforms aimed at economic empowerment, security, education, and infrastructure development.
Conclusion: A Stand for Secular, Inclusive Progress
Adebayo Shitu’s political agenda — especially his advocacy for the implementation of Sharia law in Oyo State — has stirred legitimate concern among citizens and leaders who cherish the secularism, pluralism, and peaceful coexistence that define Yorubaland.
These concerns are not rooted in religious intolerance but in a defense of harmony, human rights, economic potential, and cultural identity. The strong public reactions from traditional rulers, youth groups, religious leaders, and regional coalitions reflect a broad consensus that theocratic legal enforcement is not suitable for a region as diverse as the South‑West.
Sharia law may function in personal religious life for those who choose it. But when translated into public policy — especially in a multi‑religious, multi‑cultural society — it risks stoking division, dampening economic opportunities, and undermining the unity that has long been a source of strength for the Yoruba people.
For these reasons, any political agenda that links governance to the imposition of Sharia law must be critically examined, openly debated, and — if necessary — firmly rejected in defense of peace, progress, and collective prosperity.
0 Comments