The city of Port Harcourt, long regarded as one of Nigeria’s most economically vibrant and culturally diverse urban centers, witnessed troubling scenes recently as northern traders in Igwuruta reportedly experienced unprovoked attacks and destruction of their businesses. What followed was an alarming escalation: a group of youths organized what they described as an “Aboki Must Go” protest, calling on Northerners to vacate parts of the state.
The development has sparked national concern, not only because of the immediate violence but also because of the deeper implications for Nigeria’s unity, constitutional rights, and fragile inter-ethnic harmony.
This is not merely a local disturbance. It is a reflection of broader tensions that, if not properly addressed, could threaten the foundational principle that Nigeria belongs equally to all its citizens.
What Happened in Igwuruta?
Reports indicate that northern traders operating in Igwuruta, a community within the Port Harcourt metropolis, suffered attacks allegedly carried out by miscreants. Businesses were vandalized, goods destroyed, and livelihoods disrupted.
Subsequently, some youths staged a protest chanting “Aboki Must Go,” a slogan widely interpreted as a call for Northerners—many of whom are engaged in legitimate commercial activities—to leave the area.
The protesters allegedly justified their actions by claiming that the killings and abductions occurring in Port Harcourt were linked to Northerners residing in the city. However, no official findings or security reports have substantiated such blanket accusations.
The implication of collective guilt—assigning responsibility for crime to an entire ethnic or regional group—raises profound legal and moral concerns.
The Dangerous Logic of Collective Blame
Nigeria’s Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to reside and conduct lawful business in any part of the country without discrimination based on ethnicity, religion, or place of origin. Section 41 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) affirms the freedom of movement and residence.
When individuals are targeted solely because they are referred to as “Aboki” or “Malam”—terms commonly used to describe people from Northern Nigeria—it undermines constitutional protections and promotes a culture of exclusion.
History repeatedly shows that collective blame fuels cycles of violence rather than solving crime. Criminality has no tribe, religion, or regional identity. Nigeria’s security challenges—ranging from kidnapping to cult-related violence—are complex and multifaceted. They involve actors from diverse backgrounds and cannot be reduced to simplistic ethnic narratives.
Port Harcourt itself has faced longstanding issues with cultism, militancy, organized crime, and economic-related violence, none of which can be attributed to one ethnic or religious group alone.
The Role of Stereotyping and Media Narratives
A concerning factor in episodes like this is the power of stereotyping and generalized narratives. In recent years, public discourse—particularly on social media—has often amplified divisive rhetoric linking insecurity to certain ethnic or religious communities.
The portrayal of Northerners, particularly Muslims, in some media narratives as inherently connected to crime has contributed to suspicion and prejudice. Such sweeping characterizations are not supported by evidence and ignore the millions of Northerners who are law-abiding citizens, entrepreneurs, artisans, students, and professionals across Nigeria.
When economic frustration, unemployment, and insecurity combine with sensational narratives, they can create a volatile environment where misinformation spreads faster than verified facts.
A Tale of Two Realities: Northerners in the South, Southerners in the North
Nigeria’s interdependence is undeniable. In northern states such as Kano State, Kaduna State, Abuja, and Sokoto State, millions of Southerners live and operate businesses successfully. From electronics markets to hospitality industries, southern entrepreneurs contribute significantly to northern economies.
Likewise, northern traders are deeply integrated into commercial ecosystems in southern cities, including Port Harcourt, Lagos, Ibadan, and Enugu.
This economic symbiosis forms part of Nigeria’s strength. Disrupting it through ethnic hostility would harm not just targeted communities but the broader economy.
If calls for expulsion or intimidation were normalized, it would set a precedent that could reverberate across states—leading to retaliatory hostility elsewhere. Such a trajectory would erode trust, discourage investment, and deepen national fragmentation.
Security Concerns Must Be Addressed—But Lawfully
Security challenges in Rivers State and across Nigeria are real. Kidnappings, armed robbery, and cult-related killings have affected communities and businesses.
However, the appropriate response to insecurity is collaboration with law enforcement agencies, credible intelligence gathering, and community engagement—not mob action or targeting innocent citizens.
Blaming an entire ethnic group diverts attention from addressing the structural causes of crime, including:
Youth unemployment
Weak intelligence systems
Proliferation of small arms
Organized criminal networks
Poor inter-agency coordination
Effective security reform requires data-driven strategies, not emotional reactions fueled by rumors.
Economic Fallout: Who Really Pays the Price?
Beyond the moral implications, attacks on traders carry economic consequences.
Markets are economic lifelines. When businesses are destroyed, supply chains are disrupted. Food prices can rise. Investors may withdraw. Informal sector workers lose income. Families dependent on daily trade face hardship.
Northern traders in Port Harcourt often deal in livestock, grains, textiles, and other commodities integral to daily consumption. Disrupting these networks can create ripple effects beyond immediate victims.
Moreover, Nigeria’s reputation as a unified market suffers when citizens fear relocating for business opportunities.
The Broader National Context
Nigeria has experienced episodes of ethnic tension before. From historical communal clashes to politically charged crises, the lesson has always been clear: inflammatory rhetoric can escalate quickly if not responsibly managed.
Political leaders, religious authorities, traditional rulers, and civil society groups have a critical role to play in de-escalating tensions. Silence in moments like this can be interpreted as tacit approval.
Community dialogue forums, interfaith engagement, and joint security initiatives are more sustainable solutions than protests calling for expulsion.
Unity Is Not Optional—It Is Foundational
Nigeria’s diversity is often described as its greatest strength. With over 250 ethnic groups and multiple religious communities, coexistence is not merely aspirational; it is essential for survival.
When innocent traders are attacked because of their regional identity, it weakens national cohesion and fuels resentment that could surface elsewhere.
Unity does not mean ignoring legitimate grievances. It means addressing them within the framework of justice and law—not through prejudice or violence.
A Call for Reflection and Responsible Action
To those involved in the attacks and protests in Igwuruta, this is a sincere appeal for reflection and restraint.
Nigeria belongs to all of us.
If there are genuine concerns about security, they must be documented and presented to appropriate authorities. Community leaders should facilitate constructive dialogue rather than inflame tensions.
Dialogue, cooperation, and lawful engagement remain the only sustainable paths to peace.
Choosing hostility may offer momentary emotional release, but it carries long-term consequences that no community can afford.
The Way Forward: Protecting Lives, Protecting Unity
Authorities in Rivers State must ensure that:
1. Perpetrators of vandalism are investigated and prosecuted.
2. Victims receive protection and, where possible, compensation.
3. Public messaging reinforces unity and constitutional rights.
4. Law enforcement increases visibility to deter further unrest.
Civil society organizations should also intensify awareness campaigns against hate speech and ethnic profiling.
Most importantly, citizens must resist the temptation to generalize crime along ethnic lines.
Conclusion: Choosing Unity Over Division
The events in Igwuruta serve as a sobering reminder of how quickly suspicion can morph into hostility. But they also offer an opportunity—an opportunity to reaffirm Nigeria’s commitment to fairness, coexistence, and shared prosperity.
Let us choose unity over division.
Let us choose justice over prejudice.
Let us choose coexistence over hostility.
Nigeria’s strength lies not in uniformity but in diversity. Protecting one another—regardless of background—is not just a moral duty; it is a national responsibility.
If we fail to uphold that principle, we risk undermining the very foundation upon which the nation stands.
0 Comments