In a country where silence has become safer than truth, anyone bold enough to consistently speak out against injustice deserves recognition. VeryDarkMan (VDM) is one of those rare voices in Nigeria today who has refused to be muted by fear, intimidation, or public backlash. For that alone, he deserves applause. Nigeria needs more people like him—individuals courageous enough to confront power, challenge wrongdoing, and stand visibly on the side of ordinary citizens who often have no voice.
This piece is not written from a place of hostility or rivalry. It is written from a place of deep respect, admiration, and genuine concern. For the first time, however, I find myself holding a few contrary views about the VeryDarkMan NGO—views that I believe are necessary if this movement is to mature from a moment into a lasting institution.
Let me be clear from the outset: I do not identify as a “Ratel.” Not because I reject the values behind the movement, but because I find the culture around it somewhat limiting. At my stage in life, affiliating with cliques, fan bases, or online identity groups feels unnecessary and, frankly, a bit childish. The energy around the Ratel movement sometimes reminds me of other celebrity-driven fan bases like FCs or 30BG—communities that often start with good intentions but can quickly devolve into emotional reactions, mob behavior, and blind loyalty.
That said, it is important to separate the movement from the man. My interest has never been in the label or the crowd; it has always been in VeryDarkMan himself.
The Man Behind the Movement
My admiration for VeryDarkMan grows daily, not because he is perfect, but because he is visibly human. In a society where public figures often hide behind scripted statements, PR teams, and moral posturing, VDM stands out for his transparency. He speaks plainly. He admits his flaws. He makes mistakes in public. And most importantly, he takes responsibility for his words and actions.
These qualities—honesty, openness, and a strong sense of personal integrity—are rare in Nigeria’s civic and social advocacy space. Many activists begin with good intentions but quickly lose credibility due to compromise, inconsistency, or hidden agendas. VeryDarkMan, so far, has built his reputation on being difficult to buy, hard to intimidate, and unwilling to look away from injustice simply because it is inconvenient.
His willingness to take risks—legal, social, and personal—is what has made him such a powerful figure. He has used social media not just as a platform for commentary, but as a tool for accountability. In a country where institutions often fail the people, individuals like VDM fill a dangerous but necessary gap.
Where Concern Begins: The NGO Structure
However, admiration does not mean blind agreement. And it is precisely because VDM holds such influence that concerns about his NGO must be addressed honestly.
My biggest issue is not with the intention behind the VeryDarkMan NGO, but with its execution—particularly in how donated funds are managed and how the organization defines its mission. From an external perspective, the NGO lacks a clear, focused direction. While it has undoubtedly done a lot of good since its inception, it is difficult to point to one defining, long-term impact that clearly represents its core purpose.
This is not because the NGO has failed to help people. On the contrary, it appears to be involved in many interventions—legal cases, welfare assistance, medical emergencies, and public advocacy. The problem is that it seems to be doing everything at once.
When an organization tries to solve every problem, it often ends up solving none in a sustainable way.
The Problem With “Doing Everything”
Globally, the most effective non-governmental organizations succeed because they are focused. Reputable NGOs—whether in Nigeria or abroad—are built around specific mandates. Some focus strictly on legal aid for marginalized communities. Others specialize in emergency medical intervention. Some concentrate solely on education, housing, or policy advocacy.
Focus creates expertise. Expertise builds trust. Trust attracts sustainable funding and institutional respect.
In contrast, when an NGO jumps from crisis to crisis without a clearly defined scope, it risks becoming reactive rather than strategic. Resources become stretched. Spending becomes difficult to track in terms of measurable outcomes. Donors may begin to question where their money is going, not out of malice, but out of a genuine desire for accountability.
This is where my discomfort lies. Passion is evident in the VeryDarkMan NGO, but passion alone does not build institutions. Systems do.
Influence Without Structure Is a Missed Opportunity
With the level of influence VDM commands today, his NGO has the potential to become one of the most respected civic platforms in Nigeria. His name alone attracts attention, donations, and public trust. Few activists in the country enjoy that level of organic support.
But influence without structure is fragile.
To unlock its full potential, the NGO needs proper restructuring—clear governance, defined objectives, transparent financial systems, and disciplined spending. This is not about bureaucracy for its own sake; it is about longevity. Movements thrive on emotion, but institutions survive on structure.
Imagine if the VeryDarkMan NGO chose just one or two core areas of intervention—say, legal defense for victims of injustice and emergency medical support for abandoned or abused individuals. Over time, it could build partnerships with lawyers, hospitals, civil society groups, and even international organizations. Impact would become measurable. Success stories would compound. Trust would deepen.
Criticism Rooted in Respect
It is important to stress that these observations are not attacks. They are not attempts to discredit or undermine. They are the kind of concerns that only arise when people genuinely care about the future of a project.
VeryDarkMan has something powerful in his hands. Few Nigerians ever get the chance to mobilize people at this scale for civic good. The danger is not opposition; it is dilution. When energy is scattered, impact weakens.
Refinement is not a sign of failure. It is a sign of growth.
Why Nigeria Needs More People Like Him
Despite these concerns, one truth remains unchanged: Nigeria desperately needs more people like VeryDarkMan. We need individuals who are brave enough to speak when silence is rewarded. People willing to confront injustice even when it comes with personal cost. Leaders who own their flaws rather than pretend to be saints. Voices that inspire others to question, demand better, and act.
His kind is rare in a society where conformity often feels safer than courage. If Nigeria had more citizens with his boldness, integrity, and sense of responsibility, the nation would be stronger, more accountable, and more purposeful.
The hope is simple: that VeryDarkMan will choose structure over chaos, focus over excess, and systems over spontaneity. If he does, his NGO will not just respond to crises—it will shape the future of civic accountability in Nigeria.
And that is a legacy worth building.
0 Comments