Oyo State’s political landscape has long been defined by strong personalities and influential figures who shape electoral outcomes behind the scenes. Following the demise of , widely regarded as the era-defining “strongman” of Ibadan politics, many believed the age of political godfatherism in the state had waned. However, recent developments suggest otherwise—pointing to the emergence of as a central figure wielding significant political influence.
Observers will recall the era of “Molete politics,” a term synonymous with Adedibu’s dominance, which played a pivotal role in the emergence of as governor in 2007. Following Adedibu’s passing in 2008, the political structure he built did not immediately collapse but instead evolved, creating room for new actors to assert control.
By 2011, the political tide had shifted. , a leading figure in the progressive camp, defeated Akala to become governor. Notably, political tensions and alliances at the time were fluid. A widely circulated moment captured Ajimobi prostrating before Ladoja, reflecting the latter’s enduring relevance and influence within Oyo’s political hierarchy. However, this alliance was short-lived, as both men later fell out, setting the stage for further political rivalry.
In the 2015 gubernatorial election, Ladoja returned to the ballot under a different platform but ultimately lost to Ajimobi, who secured a second term. After this defeat, Ladoja stepped back from directly contesting elections. Yet, rather than exiting the political arena, he recalibrated his strategy—transitioning from candidate to kingmaker.
This shift became most evident in the lead-up to the 2019 elections. Ladoja played a key role in fostering a coalition of opposition forces that successfully challenged the ruling party’s dominance. The coalition’s efforts culminated in the victory of , who emerged as governor, thereby preventing Ajimobi from installing a preferred successor. Political analysts widely interpret this outcome as a demonstration of Ladoja’s enduring influence and ability to shape alliances across party lines.
Fast forward to the current political climate, and similar patterns appear to be unfolding. Ladoja is again perceived as backing a candidate—this time —within the All Progressives Congress (APC) structure in Oyo State. This development has sparked internal tensions, particularly among other aspirants who argue for a transparent and level playing field.
One of the most vocal critics is , a prominent APC figure and gubernatorial hopeful. Adelabu has openly rejected any attempt at candidate imposition, referencing past electoral outcomes as cautionary examples. In his words:
“Oba Rashidi Ladoja was responsible for Oyo APC's inability to clinch the gubernatorial election in 2019. We will reject any imposition of any candidate this time.”
This statement underscores the growing friction within the party and highlights broader concerns about internal democracy, consensus candidacies, and the enduring role of political godfathers in Nigeria’s electoral process.
The unfolding situation raises important questions: Has Oyo State truly moved beyond the era of godfatherism, or has it simply transitioned into a new phase under a different figure? While opinions remain divided, the evidence suggests that political influence in the state continues to be shaped by individuals with deep-rooted networks, strategic alliances, and historical credibility.
Indeed, for many observers, the conclusion is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore—Oyo State is not without a political godfather. The name now frequently mentioned in that context is Oba Rashidi Ladoja.
As the state approaches another critical election cycle, all eyes remain on how these dynamics will evolve, and whether emerging political actors will challenge or reinforce the established order. One thing, however, is clear: in Oyo politics, influence is rarely accidental—it is built, sustained, and strategically deployed over time.
0 Comments